System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems - key issues and recommendations
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0086-8059
KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden.
RISE, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut, SP Food and Bioscience, Environment. Lund University, Sweden.
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, ISSN 1932-104X, E-ISSN 1932-1031, Vol. 9, no 5, p. 606-619Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The current trend in biomass conversion technologies is toward more efficient utilization of biomass feedstock in multiproduct biorefineries. Many life-cycle assessment (LCA) studies of biorefinery systems have been performed but differ in how they use the LCA methodology. Based on a review of existing LCA standards and guidelines, this paper provides recommendations on how to handle key methodological issues when performing LCA studies of biorefinery systems. Six key issues were identified: (i) goal definition, (ii) functional unit, (iii) allocation of biorefinery outputs, (iv) allocation of biomass feedstock, (v) land use, and (vi) biogenic carbon and timing of emissions. Many of the standards and guidelines reviewed here provide only general methodological recommendations. Some make more specific methodological recommendations, but these often differ between standards. In this paper we present some clarifications (e.g. examples of research questions and suitable functional units) and methodological recommendations (e.g. on allocation).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 9, no 5, p. 606-619
Keywords [en]
Allocation, Biogenic carbon, Biorefinery, Functional unit, Land use, Life cycle assessment, Review
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-6915DOI: 10.1002/bbb.1563Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84941735953Local ID: 30809OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-6915DiVA, id: diva2:964757
Available from: 2016-09-08 Created: 2016-09-08 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ahlgren, SerinaBerlin, Johanna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ahlgren, SerinaBerlin, Johanna
By organisation
EnvironmentSystemanalys
In the same journal
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 367 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf