Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Unveiling the process of sustainable renovation
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
RISE, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut, SP Sveriges tekniska forskningsinstitut, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut / Byggnadsfysik och innemiljö (ETi ).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3863-0740
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
2012 (English)In: Sustainability, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 4, no 6, p. 1188-1213Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Renovation processes are complex and there is a risk of underestimating architectural, cultural, and social values in favor of exterior and interior upgrading, energy efficiency and financing. A synthesized, systematic process is needed for making decisions about renovation measures. The aim of this paper is to survey decision-making procedures aimed for sustainable renovation. We inventory existing tools and methodologies based on (a) a literature review and (b) results from a workshop with participants from the Swedish buildings sector, academia, and other stakeholders. Our results show that there are many tools available but few seem to have reached acceptance in renovation. None of the more established methods and tools addresses a complexity that balances material and immaterial values and they are often too specific. There is a need for simplified tools, especially for evaluating more intangible, experienced values. Instead of one comprehensive tool preferably a methodology for renovation should be developed with references to different tools. In the building sector, renovation should be considered a service-minded process rather than a merely technical one as often is the case in new construction. There is a need to clarify the process and the meaning of the terms, and that need is even more urgent when it comes to the values that are more difficult to define.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 4, no 6, p. 1188-1213
Keywords [en]
Building assessment, Decision-making support, Sustainable renovation, Tools and methodologies
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-6335DOI: 10.3390/su4061188Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84864327350Local ID: 13795OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-6335DiVA, id: diva2:964172
Available from: 2016-09-08 Created: 2016-09-08 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Mjörnell, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mjörnell, Kristina
By organisation
SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut / Byggnadsfysik och innemiljö (ETi )
In the same journal
Sustainability
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf