Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Biogeochemical consequences of marine fisheries and aquaculture
School of Marine Science and Policy, University of Delaware, Lewes, DE, United States.
Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Ascot, United Kingdom.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, E-ISSN 2662-138X, Vol. 6, no 3, p. 163-177, article id e107690Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Marine fisheries and aquaculture are important contributors to global food security but disturb biogeochemical cycles from local to global scales. In this Review, we summarize how marine fisheries and aquaculture affect biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus, and discuss differences in the spatial scale, duration and magnitude of their biogeochemical consequences. Globally, marine capture fisheries and aquaculture remove approximately 21.0 Tg C year–1, 4.6 Tg N year–1 and 0.97 Tg P year–1 from the ocean, dominated by fish and shellfish removal. Point-of-harvest activities in marine capture fisheries result in biomass extraction, fishing gear impacts on the sea bed, fuel use and emissions, lost fishing gear and altered trophic structure. Aquaculture involves the addition and subsequent extraction of biomass, and habitat alteration during the introduction of farm structures. These disturbances affect the biogeochemistry of the water column and sediment, influencing the cycling and fate of nutrients over days to centuries and from local to global scales. For example, animals raised in aquaculture excrete 6.5 Tg N year–1 and 1.2 Tg P year–1, contributing to global-scale effects. Better incorporating these biogeochemical effects into environmental footprint assessments of products can guide more sustainable decision-making in the sector.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2025. Vol. 6, no 3, p. 163-177, article id e107690
National Category
Fish and Aquacultural Science Environmental Sciences Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-79477DOI: 10.1038/s43017-024-00633-yScopus ID: 2-s2.0-85218198192OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-79477DiVA, id: diva2:2018243
Note

Review; Granskad

Available from: 2025-12-02 Created: 2025-12-02 Last updated: 2025-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hornborg, Sara

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hornborg, Sara
By organisation
Food Research and Innovation
In the same journal
Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
Fish and Aquacultural ScienceEnvironmental SciencesEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 77 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf