Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Traumatic injuries detected at slaughter in cattle: impact of production system and season on animal welfare and meat condemnation in Sweden
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Växa, Sweden.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Environmental Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3748-3918
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, ISSN 0044-605X, E-ISSN 1751-0147, Vol. 67, no 1, article id 18Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The purpose of ante- and post-mortem inspections at slaughterhouses is to ensure that meat and other relevant food products of animal origin are safe for human consumption. However, these inspections can also be useful for detecting animal health and welfare issues. In cattle, traumatic injuries from on-farm incidents, transport or handling at the slaughterhouse are indications of both reduced animal welfare and increased risk of food waste, ultimately resulting in economic losses for both farmers and slaughterhouses. This observational study aimed to investigate the prevalence and seasonal variation of traumatic injuries in cows and heifers reared on organic and conventional farms in Sweden. The study includes slaughter remarks and condemnations from meat inspection data from 336,071 animals slaughtered between 2020 and 2022. Two types of injuries were analysed: “chronic traumatic injuries” (CTI) sustained on-farm and “acute traumatic injuries” (ATI) sustained during transport or at the slaughterhouse. Logistic regression models were developed to assess the influence of production system and season. Results show a higher prevalence of CTI in animals from conventional farms (9.8%) compared to organic farms (6.9%; P < 0.001), which may indicate that animals from organic farms are managed and handled in a way that makes them better prepared for challenges that they are later exposed to on-farm prior to slaughter. ATI were more frequent in animals from organic farms during the grazing period (interaction between production system and season: P = 0.002), which may indicate that animals from organic farms find the transition to the slaughterhouse environment more abrupt and stressful during the grazing period. Condemnations due to injuries were significantly higher for animals with CTI or ATI compared to animals without these specific remarks. These findings highlight the importance of pre-slaughter management, both on-farm and at the slaughterhouse, and slaughterhouse design in improving animal welfare and reducing food as well as economic losses associated with carcase condemnations. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central Ltd , 2025. Vol. 67, no 1, article id 18
Keywords [en]
Abattoirs; Animal Husbandry; Animal Welfare; Animals; Cattle; Female; Meat; Prevalence; Seasons; Sweden; Wounds and Injuries; animal; animal husbandry; animal welfare; bovine; epidemiology; female; injury; meat; prevalence; procedures; season; slaughterhouse; Sweden; veterinary medicine
National Category
Animal and Dairy Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-78368DOI: 10.1186/s13028-025-00804-xScopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002942433OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-78368DiVA, id: diva2:1999492
Note

This study was funded by SLU Ekoforsk (project ”Improved welfare of organic pigs and cattle at slaughter—evaluation and development of animal welfare indicators and their association to meat quality” ) and the Swedish Research Council for sustainable development (FORMAS), grant number 2018–01134.

Available from: 2025-09-19 Created: 2025-09-19 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(897 kB)35 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 897 kBChecksum SHA-512
55cf3a4c0183df8a4008ec07a6f673f6467319a45daf8405aad322a7728d073d8793bb12632dc9a831b3a4ce5b4eb9cfc574e72a443a6aa29200743d9c60ab14
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lindahl, Cecilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, Cecilia
By organisation
Agriculture and Environmental Engineering
In the same journal
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Animal and Dairy Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 36 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 757 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf