Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
To Vaccinate or Not to Vaccinate?: Analyzing X Power over the Pandemic
Tampere University, Finland.
Tampere University, Finland.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden. Tampere University, Finland.
Tampere University, Finland.
2025 (English)In: Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, ISSN 2367-4512, Vol. 251, p. 352-365Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected the normal course of life – from lock-downs and virtual meetings to the unprecedentedly swift creation of vaccines. To halt the COVID-19 pandemic, the world has started preparing for the global vaccine roll-out. In an effort to navigate the immense volume of information about COVID-19, the public has turned to social networks. Among them, X (formerly Twitter) has played a key role in distributing related information. Most people are not trained to interpret medical research and remain skeptical about the efficacy of new vaccines. Measuring their reactions and perceptions is gaining significance in the fight against COVID-19. To assess the public perception regarding the COVID-19 vaccine, our work applies a sentiment analysis approach, using natural language processing of X data. We show how to use textual analytics and textual data visualization to discover early insights (for example, by analyzing the most frequently used keywords and hashtags). Furthermore, we look at how people’s sentiments vary across the countries. Our results indicate that although the overall reaction to the vaccine is positive, there are also negative sentiments associated with the tweets, especially when examined at the country level. Additionally, from the extracted tweets, we manually labeled 100 tweets as positive and 100 tweets as negative and trained various One-Class Classifiers (OCCs). The experimental results indicate that the S-SVDD classifiers outperform other OCCs

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH , 2025. Vol. 251, p. 352-365
Keywords [en]
Data reduction; Labeled data; Analysis approach; Language processing; Medical research; Natural languages; One-class classifier; Power; Public perception; Sentiment analysis; Textual data; Virtual meetings; Emotion Recognition
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-78598DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-87781-0_35Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105003542196OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-78598DiVA, id: diva2:1965881
Conference
Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications (AINA-2025), Volume 7
Available from: 2025-06-09 Created: 2025-06-09 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf