Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Life cycle assessment of a circular textile value chain: the case of a garment made from chemically recycled cotton
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Methodology, Textiles and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2961-5933
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Methodology, Textiles and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3140-6823
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Methodology, Textiles and Medical Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6857-3364
2024 (English)In: The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, ISSN 0948-3349, E-ISSN 1614-7502, Vol. 29, no 10, p. 1880-Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The textile industry faces major challenges in reducing environmental impacts along the whole value chain. The overall aim of this paper was to assess the potential environmental benefit of a circular textile value chain, by evaluating a garment partly made from a chemically recycled cellulose carbamate fibre. The cellulose carbamate technology is a novel technology that turns cotton-rich textile waste into a cotton-like regenerated fibre. Methods: Life cycle assessment was performed to evaluate the environmental impacts of a garment made from the chemically recycled fibre, considering the whole life cycle. The evaluation also considered that the garment was part of a take-back system, meaning that the garment is collected for recycling after consumer use and thereby helps in closing the loop of the circular textile value chain. The focus of the assessment was on climate impact, water scarcity impact and land use impact. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were included to test parts of the European Commission’s product environmental footprint method, e.g. the impact of applying the circular footprint formula. Results and discussion: The results showed that using a recycled cellulose carbamate fibre over primary conventional cotton showed benefits in all considered environmental impact categories; compared to organic cotton, the benefits were also shown for the land use impact category; the cradle to gate processes were the main hotspots for the garment’s life cycle, meaning that using a recycled feedstock is not the only measure needed to reduce environmental burdens;  the use phase, and in particular using the garment to its full life length, is crucial for mitigating the environmental impact per garment use; and methodological choices related to the use of recycled feedstock, and sending materials to recycling at end-of-life, affect the outcome of the study. Conclusions: Selecting a chemically recycled cellulose carbamate fibre over primary fibres showed environmental benefits for the evaluated garment, but there are however trade-offs between different environmental impact categories and fibre types. Furthermore, using recycled fibres is one important step in reducing the environmental concerns of garments, but it is important to also make improvements along the whole textile value chain. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2024. Vol. 29, no 10, p. 1880-
Keywords [en]
Cellulose; Cotton; Economic and social effects; Feedstocks; Land use; Life cycle; Recycling; Sensitivity analysis; Textile fibers; Textile industry; Textiles; Cellulose carbamate fiber; Cellulose carbamates; Circular footprint formula; Environmental benefits; Land use impact; LCA; Recycled cellulose; Recycled fibers; Textile recycling; Value chains; Environmental impact
National Category
Environmental Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-74661DOI: 10.1007/s11367-024-02346-2Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85199304043OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-74661DiVA, id: diva2:1887066
Note

Open access funding provided by RISE Research Institutes of Sweden. This work was supported by the European Union\u2019s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 101000559.

Available from: 2024-08-06 Created: 2024-08-06 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1917 kB)250 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1917 kBChecksum SHA-512
9b4b4e922bb2ecb968d5ceeb3d75926bf39b14327c2898c15ae9f7b6d1599cdc19387956ad13156b97b5d37f28513c59f0ec22ca8736be008de7646682923cef
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hammar, TorunPeñaloza, DiegoHanning, Anne-Charlotte

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hammar, TorunPeñaloza, DiegoHanning, Anne-Charlotte
By organisation
Methodology, Textiles and Medical Technology
In the same journal
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 259 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 231 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf