Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Multifuel energy stations for cars, buses and trucks - Interreg Baltic Sea Region Project #R032 “Sustainable and Multimodal Transport Actions in the Scandinavian-Adriatic Corridor”: Technical Support Document
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Safety and Transport, Electrification and Reliability.
2018 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The report discusses the positive and negative effects of co-locating clean fuels with each other or with conventional fuels at multifuel energy stations (MES). The fuels considered as clean are CBG/CNG, LBG/LNG, hydrogen and fast charging of electrical vehicles. For hydrogen, CH2 has been considered in the study. However, to some extent aspects related to LH2 have been considered also. Multifuel energy stations are also referred to as “multifuel stations” and “multi energy stations” in this report. We have identified three station types; car station, truck station and bus depot. Those three use different fuels to some extent which also impact safety measures and station layout. Safety aspects with focus on explosion risks have been studied for the different clean fuels present at multifuel energy stations, as well as technical aspects of co-locating such fuels. From this material, conclusions have been drawn on the effects of offering clean fuels at multifuel energy stations. Car and bus stations are quite similar, but truck stations differ a bit due to liquefied gas being present and no fast charging is offered. The study and this report cover Sweden (SE), Norway (NO), Denmark (DK), Finland (FI) and Germany (DE) located along the Northern Scandria®Corridor, with the main focus on Sweden. This is a natural part of chapter 7: Safety for multifuel energy stations, and the technical and economical synergies have high transferability in general and they are therefore written in a non-country specific manner.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 64
National Category
Transport Systems and Logistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-59193OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-59193DiVA, id: diva2:1657631
Available from: 2022-05-11 Created: 2022-05-11 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(566 kB)164 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 566 kBChecksum SHA-512
aa1b09a6eb06c8b5c3a57c3094ed1721d311af15702fa9ac1f23a2800281e80309c6ada201508812283694b8e51a670f2ef1c95edb6ff4c348ea3edce4e408bd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Electrification and Reliability
Transport Systems and Logistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 170 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 220 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf