Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rehabilitated escape route doors: Mounting of glass, boards and sealing lists
SINTEF, Norway.
NIKU, Norway.
2020 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Older wooden escape route doors are often a week point in the fire safety in apartment buildings. This report presents possible solutions for mounting of glass, protective boards and sealing lists when upgrading older wooden escape route doors with a cultural heritage value. 

These types of doors normally have a thickness of 45-50 mm, with glass on the upper part, and a thinner wooden door-panel on the lower part. For antiquary reasons the interventions on the doors should be as little intrusive and as reversable as possible. 

Different solutions for mounting of fire rated glass, gypsum boards and ceiling lists are shown in the report. The main conclusions are:     • Glass must have fire resistance EI 30, and be securely fastened with steel frames or steel clips     • Heavy use of doors implies mounting of 12,5 mm Robust gypsum boards     • Both expanding lists and silicone gaskets must be mounted to stop cold and hot smoke     • The area between the door frame and the wall must be sealed using mineral wool and expanding fire sealant  

The solutions given in this report are preliminary solutions and will later be used as basis for small-scale and full-scale testing. The results from the fire testing will be given in a report describing finally necessary upgrading solutions in detail.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. , p. 26
Series
FRIC REPORT ; D4.3-2020-09
National Category
Reliability and Maintenance
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-52503OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-52503DiVA, id: diva2:1532767
Note

SINTEF and NIKU – Norsk institutt for kulturminneforskning has had a close collaboration in this project. We would like to thank the following FRIC-partners for contributing to discussions and input in several project meetings during the autumn of 2020:- Morten Pedersen, Trøndelag fylkeskommune- Robert Olofsson, RISE Fire Research- Christian Widén-Björk, Trøndelag Brann- og Redningstjeneste IKS- Torgeir Brurok, Trøndelag Brann- og Redningstjeneste IKS- Brynhild Garberg Olsø, SINTEF

Available from: 2021-03-02 Created: 2021-03-02 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(10202 kB)199 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 10202 kBChecksum SHA-512
2727382f92cbead3ef6d925ab8f964c54cf45c41e2e1b5e7ed1ee9cd17d352e7a3cf8f2e424286e90e85e72a63463d27a32a399eb4c49a6063b34beb85bc9ae2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Reliability and Maintenance

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 318 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 736 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf