Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How to Deal with Differing Views of Resource Efficiency when Carrying out Digitalization Projects
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Product Realisation Methodology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9550-7220
Malardalen University, Sweden.
Malardalen University, Sweden.
2020 (English)In: Advances in Transdisciplinary Engineering, ISSN 2352-751X, Vol. 13, p. 71-82Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Having project goals that are shared among project members are preconditions for resource efficient as well effective projects and operations. However, specifying and communicating project goals require an ability to identify goals that are indeed commonly shared. Rapid technological developments may require digitalization projects that lead to large portions of existing company staff being redundant, making it possible to assume that the quest of finding a commonly shared view of what is resource-efficient' will be increasingly challenging. Development of methods to specify project goals that are incentivizing for all project members and staff can hence be assumed to be important. One step in developing improved specification methods is to ask how the process to specify desired value from digitalization projects handles possible disagreements of what is desired value'. The purpose of this study was to answer this question. We analyzed several digitalization projects, and how specifications of desired project results impacted project outcomes. We found that potential disagreements regarding desirable project outcomes generally are avoided by avoiding specification of what a desirable resource efficiency outcome is, and how actual project outcomes should be measured. However, we also found that this practice also led to unsatisfying project outcomes regarding resource-efficiency improvements, and that improved methods to specify desired value from digitalization projects should be developed. Our findings support earlier findings that the general failure rate of digitalization projects is high, often due to insufficient specification of desired projects outcomes before the projects are initiated. Our findings contribute to the understanding that despite this, there are also perceived benefits of spending limited resources on specification of desired outcomes. If attempts to improve the success rate of digitalization projects by improving specifications of desired project outcomes is to succeed, these perceived benefits must be considered. © 2020 The authors

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOS Press BV , 2020. Vol. 13, p. 71-82
Keywords [en]
automation, digitalization, effectiveness, resource-efficiency, Value, Efficiency, Failure analysis, Project management, Failure rate, Perceived benefits, Project goals, Project outcomes, Resource efficiencies, Resource-efficient, Technological development, Specifications
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-51952DOI: 10.3233/ATDE200144Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85098646351ISBN: 9781614994398 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-51952DiVA, id: diva2:1523367
Conference
9th Swedish Production Symposium, SPS 2020, 7 October 2020 through 8 October 2020
Note

Funding details: VINNOVA; Funding text 1: This study was part of the research projects: ‘Automated design of production tools’ (ADaPT) and ‘Efficient automation for adapted products in Swedish factories’ (e-Factory) financed by the Swedish Agency for Innovation Systems (Vinnova). And ‘Sustainable Textile Barriers’ (Texbar) financed by Mistra Innovation. The research was performed in the context of the XPRES environment at Rise IVF AB and Mälardalen University.

Available from: 2021-01-28 Created: 2021-01-28 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Grahn, Sten

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Grahn, Sten
By organisation
Product Realisation Methodology
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 54 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf