Sustainable structural composites can significantly lower vehicle-related emissions. To evaluate the recycling of different composite materials, laboratory-scale pyrolysis was conducted and assessed both technically and environmentally. Two demonstrators were studied: a truck side skirt made from natural flax and hemp fibres with polypropylene (PP), and a car front header composed of glass fibres and PP. Additional materials examined included thermoplastic composites containing polyamide 6 (PA6), bio-based polyamide 11 (PA11) and thermoset polyester. Results showed that material type strongly influenced the pyrolysis outcome, product composition and recycling potential. Glass fibres could be recovered and reused as reinforced fibres, while natural fibres could be recovered as biooil for potential use in biofuel production. Polymers were recovered as pyrolysis products that, depending on their composition, can be used in different applications, from recovering monomers from PA6 to producing hydrocarbons that may replace naphtha (from PP) or aromatics (from polyester) in the petrochemical industry. Life cycle assessment (LCA) findings revealed that the climate impact of composite recycling is primarily driven by the environmental burdens of the recycling process itself and by the ability of recovered materials and chemicals to substitute conventional fossil-based alternatives. Efficient recycling pathways are therefore essential to maximising environmental benefits