System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Suppression of battery energy storage system fires
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Safety and Transport, Fire and Safety. RISE Fire Research, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3445-8074
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Safety and Transport, Fire and Safety. RISE Fire Research, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8413-7500
SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Thermal Energy, Trondheim, Norway.
SINTEF Energy Research, Department of Thermal Energy, Trondheim, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Fire safety journal, ISSN 0379-7112, E-ISSN 1873-7226, Vol. 162Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates the interaction between suppression, detection, ventilation, and explosion protection systems in a confined battery room to address the lack of fire safety data for building-integrated battery energy storage systems. Six large-scale fire suppression experiments were conducted in a mock-up battery room. Four suppression systems, high- and low-pressure water mist, sprinkler, and IG-541, were evaluated alongside a freeburn and gas venting scenario. Their performance was assessed based on thermal runaway propagation, temperature development, structural damage, gas accumulation, deflagration risk, and firewater contamination. IG-541 was the only system to extinguish external flames and prevent module-to-module propagation. However, explosion protection remains critical due to the accumulation of flammable gases. It is therefore essential to design inert-gas systems with a sufficient hold time and to establish a strategy for safely evacuating all flammable gases from the room once thermal runaway has fully ceased, without igniting the gas mixture. Achieving this can be challenging. The water-based systems were generally effective at cooling, but the low-pressure water mist experiment highlighted the need for optimised droplet distribution, as hot spots may lead to unit-to-unit propagation and structural damage. Ventilation prevented deflagration, but minimum airflow requirements need further study. Effective fire safety requires integrating suppression with detection, ventilation, and explosion protection, tailored to the thermal runaway characteristics

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV , 2026. Vol. 162
Keywords [en]
Battery energy storage system, Battery room fire, Experiment, Suppression
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-81317DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104727Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105033641664OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-81317DiVA, id: diva2:2052847
Note

QC 20260414

Available from: 2026-04-14 Created: 2026-04-14 Last updated: 2026-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Meraner, ChristophFjærestad, Janne SirenLi, Tian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Meraner, ChristophFjærestad, Janne SirenLi, Tian
By organisation
Fire and Safety
In the same journal
Fire safety journal
Other Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 67 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf