Sensors: future tools for detecting young patient’s stress during a dental invasive versus a non-invasive dental treatment—a pilot studyShow others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, ISSN 1818-6300, E-ISSN 1996-9805Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]
Aim: A reliable tool to visualise children’s early stress signs to prevent dental fear development is needed. The aim was to evaluate the commercially available, CE marked, Shimmer3 GSR + unit’s ability to indicate for stress as a reaction of fear or pain for a non-invasive dental treatment (NI) and an invasive dental treatment (I). Methods: Patients 14–16 years old were invited to undergo an oral check-up (NI) or an orthodontic premolar extraction (I), respectively. Digital data, measured via electrodes and optical pulse probe, placed on the wrist and fingers, monitored by the Shimmer3 GSR + unit, was transferred via Bluetooth to the HP-laptop. The observed digital parameters were: heart rate based on photoplethysmography (PPG), galvanic skin response (GSR), and 3-axis gyroscope and accelerometer signals for hand movements. Protocols for patient self-report scales were used: coloured analogue scale for pain intensity, facial analogue scale for the mood, and a dental fear scale. Descriptive statistics was performed. Results: The NI-group: 20 patients, (14.6 ± 0.5 years), underwent 20 oral check-ups. The I-group: 14 patients, (15.3 ± 0.5 years), underwent 28 premolar extractions. All patients tolerated the Shimmer3 GSR + unit well. The GSR signal increased significantly, at start and during the oral injection, in the I-group. The GSR amplitudes persisted throughout and post the dental injection. No general uniform pattern or high GSR amplitudes were produced regarding NI-group. Conclusions: Considering the limitations of this study, the following conclusions can be made: the invasive treatment resulted in a specific unison GSR pattern, while the non-invasive procedure showed individually scattered GSR reactions. The commercially available CE-marked Shimmer3 GSR + device indicated the patient’s stress response triggered by the invasive anaesthetic procedure. © The Author(s) 2024.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH , 2024.
National Category
Clinical Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-76239DOI: 10.1007/s40368-024-00967-7Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85209127737OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-76239DiVA, id: diva2:1932791
Note
Open access funding provided by University of Gothenburg. Svenska Pedodontiföreningen, Health and Medical Care Committee of the Regional Executive Board, Region Västra Götaland, Göteborgs Tandläkare-Sällskap, Stiftelsen Patentmedelsfonden för Odontologisk Profylaxforskning, Sveriges Tandläkarförbund, Stiftelserna Wilhelm och Martina Lundgrens.
2025-01-292025-01-292025-09-23Bibliographically approved