Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative use of different emission measurement approaches to determine methane emissions from a biogas plant
Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Germany.
DTU Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Germany.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Samhällsbyggnad, Energi och cirkulär ekonomi. (Urbana försörjningssystem)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6337-6695
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2017 (Engelska)Ingår i: Waste Management, ISSN 0956-053X, E-ISSN 1879-2456, Vol. 68, s. 173-185Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

A sustainable anaerobic biowaste treatment has to mitigate methane emissions from the entire biogas production chain, but the exact quantification of these emissions remains a challenge. This study presents a comparative measurement campaign carried out with on-site and ground-based remote sensing measurement approaches conducted by six measuring teams at a Swedish biowaste treatment plant. The measured emissions showed high variations, amongst others caused by different periods of measurement performance in connection with varying operational states of the plant. The overall methane emissions measured by ground-based remote sensing varied from 5 to 25 kg h−1 (corresponding to a methane loss of 0.6–3.0% of upgraded methane produced), depending on operating conditions and the measurement method applied. Overall methane emissions measured by the on-site measuring approaches varied between 5 and 17 kg h−1 (corresponding to a methane loss of 0.6 and 2.1%) from team to team, depending on the number of measured emission points, operational state during the measurements and the measurement method applied. Taking the operational conditions into account, the deviation between different approaches and teams could be explained, in that the two largest methane-emitting sources, contributing about 90% of the entire site’s emissions, were found to be the open digestate storage tank and a pressure release valve on the compressor station.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2017. Vol. 68, s. 173-185
Nyckelord [en]
Biowaste; Biogas; Diffuse emissions; Tracer dispersion; Remote sensing; Leak detection
Nationell ämneskategori
Energisystem
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-32842DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.053Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85020823125OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-32842DiVA, id: diva2:1164120
Forskningsfinansiär
EnergimyndighetenTillgänglig från: 2017-12-10 Skapad: 2017-12-10 Senast uppdaterad: 2025-09-23Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopushttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X17304361

Person

Holmgren, Magnus Andreas

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Holmgren, Magnus Andreas
Av organisationen
Energi och cirkulär ekonomi
I samma tidskrift
Waste Management
Energisystem

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 103 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf