Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative use of different emission measurement approaches to determine methane emissions from a biogas plant
Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Germany.
DTU Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gemeinnützige GmbH, Germany.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Samhällsbyggnad, Energi och cirkulär ekonomi. (Urbana försörjningssystem)ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6337-6695
Vise andre og tillknytning
2017 (engelsk)Inngår i: Waste Management, ISSN 0956-053X, E-ISSN 1879-2456, Vol. 68, s. 173-185Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

A sustainable anaerobic biowaste treatment has to mitigate methane emissions from the entire biogas production chain, but the exact quantification of these emissions remains a challenge. This study presents a comparative measurement campaign carried out with on-site and ground-based remote sensing measurement approaches conducted by six measuring teams at a Swedish biowaste treatment plant. The measured emissions showed high variations, amongst others caused by different periods of measurement performance in connection with varying operational states of the plant. The overall methane emissions measured by ground-based remote sensing varied from 5 to 25 kg h−1 (corresponding to a methane loss of 0.6–3.0% of upgraded methane produced), depending on operating conditions and the measurement method applied. Overall methane emissions measured by the on-site measuring approaches varied between 5 and 17 kg h−1 (corresponding to a methane loss of 0.6 and 2.1%) from team to team, depending on the number of measured emission points, operational state during the measurements and the measurement method applied. Taking the operational conditions into account, the deviation between different approaches and teams could be explained, in that the two largest methane-emitting sources, contributing about 90% of the entire site’s emissions, were found to be the open digestate storage tank and a pressure release valve on the compressor station.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. Vol. 68, s. 173-185
Emneord [en]
Biowaste; Biogas; Diffuse emissions; Tracer dispersion; Remote sensing; Leak detection
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-32842DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.053Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85020823125OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-32842DiVA, id: diva2:1164120
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Energy AgencyTilgjengelig fra: 2017-12-10 Laget: 2017-12-10 Sist oppdatert: 2025-09-23bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopushttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X17304361

Person

Holmgren, Magnus Andreas

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Holmgren, Magnus Andreas
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Waste Management

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 103 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.47.0