Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The transition to a circular economy: different paths for international and non-international micro-manufacturing firms
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Built Environment, System Transition and Service Innovation. Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia.
Society for Inclusive and Collaborative Entrepreneurship, Germany.
LUT University, Finland; Halmstad University, Sweden.
Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia.
2024 (English)In: Discover Sustainability, E-ISSN 2662-9984, Vol. 5, no 1, article id 178Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article examines how environmental awareness, stakeholder pressure, circular economy orientation and internal barriers influence circular economy practices in international and non-international micro-firms. For this, we utilised fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) using data from 128 micro firms operating in different manufacturing industries in Estonia. Three paths were identified for explaining circular economy practices in internationally operating micro-firms and two paths for explaining it in micro-firms that do not operate internationally. Our results show that understanding the impact of the four before-mentioned aspects can be beneficial for engaging in circular economy efforts in both international and non-international micro-firms. The intricate five pathways (three for international and two for non-international) through which environmental awareness, stakeholder pressure, circular economy orientation, and internal barriers shape circular economy practices in micro-firms, challenging conventional understandings and offering nuanced insights for effective engagement in sustainable business practices. Based on the findings, theoretical and practical implications of this study and directions for future research are discussed. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature , 2024. Vol. 5, no 1, article id 178
Keywords [en]
environmental management; firm size; future prospect; manufacturing; research; stakeholder
National Category
Economics and Business
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-74772DOI: 10.1007/s43621-024-00367-3Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85200393456OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-74772DiVA, id: diva2:1895350
Available from: 2024-09-05 Created: 2024-09-05 Last updated: 2026-02-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(829 kB)74 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 829 kBChecksum SHA-512
b4009e1b496236a9d54c5f28b4ffdbd8de3752dd913997464f517f7782820fdcf8b77a69ae61e5d0c21ed1c79a71893cf02148518cdd813741e0856fc0775f7e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
System Transition and Service Innovation
In the same journal
Discover Sustainability
Economics and Business

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 75 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 327 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf