Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Alternative names
Publications (10 of 39) Show all publications
Fjellgaard Mikalsen, R., Stølen, R. & Hox, K. (2026). Agricultural fire safety and preparedness: Current status and knowledge gaps identified in a pilot study. In: : . Paper presented at the Nordic Fire & Safety Days (NFSD).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Agricultural fire safety and preparedness: Current status and knowledge gaps identified in a pilot study
2026 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Fires in agriculture is a complex topic, and to minimize the consequences, a combination of organizational and technical measures are needed. In this pre-project we make an overall evaluation of the situation and knowledge gaps in the sector in Norway today. We focus on identifying the typical causes of fires in agriculture and to consider measures that could reduce both the number and extent of agricultural fires.

Keywords
Agricultural buildings, Livestock welfare, Energy & storage risks, Preparedness
National Category
Agricultural Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-81955 (URN)
Conference
the Nordic Fire & Safety Days (NFSD)
Note

Presented at the Nordic Fire & Safety Days (NFSD), August 2026, Copenhagen

Available from: 2026-07-13 Created: 2026-07-13 Last updated: 2026-07-13Bibliographically approved
Ko, Y., Duong, D., Stølen, R. & Fjærestad, J. S. (2026). Fire Behaviour of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Claddings Under Different Cavity Conditions: Glass Failure to Ignition. Solar, 6(1), Article ID 1.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Fire Behaviour of Building-Integrated Photovoltaic Claddings Under Different Cavity Conditions: Glass Failure to Ignition
2026 (English)In: Solar, ISSN 2673-9941, Vol. 6, no 1, article id 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study investigates the fire behaviour of building-integrated photovoltaic (PV) claddings, focusing on the progression from glass failure to ignition under different cavity conditions. Experimental tests were conducted on two common PV cladding types: bifacial dual-glass (GG) and monofacial glass–plastic (GP) modules. Results revealed that GP modules exhibited faster burning and higher peak heat release rates (HRR), reaching up to 600 kW, while GG modules burned more slowly with peak HRR between 50 and 100 kW. Cavity conditions, including depth, ventilation, and operational energization, were found to be vital in determining glass breakage, occurring between 400 and 550 °C, and cavity ignition and subsequent flame spread. The relationship between cavity fire dynamics and glass breakage suggests the importance of system design, particularly regarding cavity ventilation and flame barriers, for mitigating upward fire propagation. These results establish a basis for advancing numerical fire models through integration of critical parameters such as material properties, glass breakage, cavity ignition, and cavity configuration. This approach supports comprehensive real-scale analysis to guide the development of effective design recommendations, ultimately improving fire safety in PV-integrated construction. © 2025 by the authors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG, 2026
Keywords
building electrification, building integrated photovoltaic material, façade fires, upward fire spread
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-80933 (URN)10.3390/solar6010001 (DOI)2-s2.0-105031302227 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20260310

Available from: 2026-03-10 Created: 2026-03-10 Last updated: 2026-03-18Bibliographically approved
Stølen, R. (2026). Fire Dynamics in Timber Buildings. NTNU
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Fire Dynamics in Timber Buildings
2026 (English)Other (Refereed)
Abstract [no]

prøveforelesning

Place, publisher, year, pages
NTNU, 2026
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-81275 (URN)
Available from: 2026-03-27 Created: 2026-03-27 Last updated: 2026-04-01Bibliographically approved
Stølen, R. (2026). Fire safety of photovoltaic installations on buildings. NTNU
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Fire safety of photovoltaic installations on buildings
2026 (English)Other (Refereed)
Abstract [sv]

Dispuation

Place, publisher, year, pages
NTNU, 2026
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-81276 (URN)
Available from: 2026-03-27 Created: 2026-03-27 Last updated: 2026-04-01Bibliographically approved
Ko, Y., Duong, D., Stølen, R. & Fjærestad, J. S. (2026). SBiPV Phase 1. Upward fire spread over photovoltaic façade claddings: An initial comparative analysis with conventional cladding materials. Fire safety journal, 163
Open this publication in new window or tab >>SBiPV Phase 1. Upward fire spread over photovoltaic façade claddings: An initial comparative analysis with conventional cladding materials
2026 (English)In: Fire safety journal, ISSN 0379-7112, E-ISSN 1873-7226, Vol. 163Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This study examines the upward fire spread characteristics of photovoltaic (PV) façade claddings in comparison to conventional building materials, to improve the understanding of fire safety implications for Building-Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV). Through mid-scale experimental testing, the upward fire spread over PV claddings was measured using Long-wave infrared (LWIR) thermography, effectively tracking pyrolysis fronts and thermal damage. Bifacial dual-glass (GG) modules demonstrated slower fire spread than monofacial glass-plastic (GP) modules due to enhanced material resilience and encapsulation. Cavity conditions also affected the upward fire spread rates, with open cavities promoting rapid flame propagation and closed or channelled cavities delaying cavity ignition until glass breakage occurred at temperatures between 400 and 550 °C. Energized modules exhibited increased fire spread rates, approximately 17% for GP and 40% for GG modules, highlighting the impact of PV operational temperatures. Fire spread rates varied widely, with GG modules ranging from 1.1 to 2.9 mm/s and GP modules accelerating from 0.8 to 0.9 mm/s to 28–47 mm/s under dual-sided heating. Notably, GP modules surpassed the fire spread rates of conventional materials such as plywood and PMMA under similar conditions

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier BV, 2026
Keywords
Building electrification, Building integrated photovoltaic material, Façade fires, Upward fire spread
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-81431 (URN)10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104839 (DOI)2-s2.0-105035482534 (Scopus ID)
Note

QC 20260427

Available from: 2026-04-27 Created: 2026-04-27 Last updated: 2026-04-27Bibliographically approved
Wang, L., Stølen, R. & Skreiberg, Ø. (2026). Study on Thermal Stability and Combustion Characteristics of Biocarbon. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 126, 199-204
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Study on Thermal Stability and Combustion Characteristics of Biocarbon
2026 (English)In: Chemical Engineering Transactions, ISSN 1974-9791, E-ISSN 2283-9216, Vol. 126, p. 199-204Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Biocarbon, produced from renewable biomass, possesses unique physical and chemical properties that allow its utilization in metal production to replace conventional reductants, thereby reducing the carbon footprint and enhancing sustainability in metallurgical industries. However, there are risk related self-ignition and firing of biocarbon with toxic emissions along values chains from production to end users. This study investigates the combustion characteristics of wood biocarbon using a cone calorimetry. During cone calorimetry tests, the heat release rate (HRR), peak HRR, total heat release (THR), mass loss, and CO and CO2 release profiles were monitored for two particle size ranges: 0.5 ≤ d ≤ 1 mm and 4 ≤ d ≤ 6.3 µm. Significantly different results were observed based on particle size, demonstrating distinct flammability and combustibility behaviour. The smaller particle size yielded a higher THR 55.8 MJ/m2, compared to the larger size (40.8 MJ/m2). Conversely, the smaller particles resulted in a lower peak HRR (28.7 kW/m2) than the larger particles (30.2 kW/m2). These differences are attributed to variations in bulk density and surface area within the sample holder. The higher bulk density of the smaller particles limits heat transfer but increases the total sample mass, thus increasing the THR. In both particle sizes, an ash layer formed on the surface, which likely hindered heat and mass transfer during the conversion of the underlying carbon material. These findings provide valuable data for assessing the ignition, combustion, and flammability properties of biocarbon. Results from the current study are valuable for assessing properties of biocarbon related to ignition, combustion and flammability. Copyright

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Italian Association of Chemical Engineering - AIDIC, 2026
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-82237 (URN)10.3303/CET26126034 (DOI)2-s2.0-105044731249 (Scopus ID)
Note

Funding text: The authors acknowledge support from the project Improving energy production and safety in biocarbon value chains (EnergyProSafe). The supports are through the funding from the Research Council of Norway (grant no: 353147) and financial support from the EnergyProSafe project industry partners. | Funding details: Norges Forskningsråd, (353147)

Available from: 2026-08-05 Created: 2026-08-05 Last updated: 2026-08-05Bibliographically approved
Lian, T., Fjellgaard Mikalsen, R., Valset, K., Meraner, C., Li, T., Snersrud, D. O., . . . Vie, P. J. S. (2025). Influence of Abuse Methods on Thermal Runaway in Lithium-Ion Cells: Measured Heats from Battery, Jet Flame, and Oxygen Depletion Calorimetry. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 172(8), Article ID 080517.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Influence of Abuse Methods on Thermal Runaway in Lithium-Ion Cells: Measured Heats from Battery, Jet Flame, and Oxygen Depletion Calorimetry
Show others...
2025 (English)In: Journal of The Electrochemical Society, Vol. 172, no 8, article id 080517Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The amount of heat generated during thermal runaway in lithium-ion cells is dependent on the failure mechanism and abuse method. This study determines the heats generated inside and outside a 64 Ah lithium-ion pouch cell when it is forced into thermal runaway by nail penetration, heating, or overcharging. The generated heats were determined by battery calorimetry, jet flame calorimetry, and oxygen depletion calorimetry. The ratio between heat generated inside or outside the cell is found to be dependent on the abuse method. The overcharge experiment was most severe with respect to heat generated outside the cell, with 89% more thermal energy measured by the jet flame calorimeter compared to nail penetration. For heat generated inside the cell it was opposite, where nail penetration was the most severe with 53% more thermal heat generated compared to overcharge. We explain these differences from the cell mass losses during thermal runaway. When the cell mass loss increases, the heat generated outside the cell increases and simultaneously the internal heat generation decreases. For the safety of a battery module, these results imply that the possibility for propagation of a thermal runaway between cells is dependent on failure mechanism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP Publishing, 2025
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-78789 (URN)10.1149/1945-7111/adeed3 (DOI)
Note

This work was part of the BattMarine project (project number281005) and 2ND LIFE project (project number 320760), funded bythe Research Council of Norway and Norwegian industry. Thecompletion of the manuscript has received funding from the FireResearch and Innovation Centre (FRIC), which is funded by itspartners, the Research Council of Norway (programBRANNSIKKERHET, project number 294649) and the GjensidigeFoundation.

Available from: 2025-09-12 Created: 2025-09-12 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Meraner, C., Stølen, R., Skilbred, E. S. & Li, T. (2025). Large-scale experimental study of open, impinging and confined hydrogen jet fires. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 96, Article ID 105614.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Large-scale experimental study of open, impinging and confined hydrogen jet fires
2025 (English)In: Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, ISSN 0950-4230, E-ISSN 1873-3352, Vol. 96, article id 105614Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Hydrogen tanks used in transportation are equipped with thermal pressure relief devices to prevent a tank rapture in case of fire exposure. The opening of the pressure relief valve, in such a scenario, would likely result in an impinging and (semi-) confined hydrogen jet fire. Therefore, twelve large-scale experiments of hydrogen jet fires and one large-scale propane reference experiment have been conducted with various degrees of confinement, orientations of the jet, and distances from the nozzle to the impinging surface. Infrared and visible light videos, temperatures, heat fluxes, and mass flow rate of hydrogen or propane were recorded in each experiment. It was found that the hydrogen flame can be visible under certain conditions. The main difference between an open impinging jet and an enclosed impinging jet fire is the extent of the high-temperature region in the steel target. During the impinging jet fire test, 51% of the exposed target area exceeded 400 °C, while 80% of the comparable area exceeded 400 °C during the confined jet fire test. A comparison was also made to an enclosed propane jet fire. The temperature distribution during the propane fire was more uniform than during the hydrogen jet fire, and the localized hot spot in the impact region, as seen in the hydrogen jet fires, was not recorded. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd, 2025
Keywords
Fighter aircraft; Flammability testing; Jets; Premixed flames; Tanks (containers); Confinement; Fire tests; Hydrogen jet fires; Hydrogen safety; Hydrogen tank; Impingement; Impinging jet; Jet fire; Large scale experiments; Large-scales; Pressure relief valves
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-78381 (URN)10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105614 (DOI)2-s2.0-86000153269 (Scopus ID)
Note

Funding: This work financed by the Research Council of Norway and the partner of the SH2IFT project [grant number 280964/ E20].

Available from: 2025-09-19 Created: 2025-09-19 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Fjærestad, J. S., Stølen, R. & Steemann Kristensen, J. (2024). EBOB - Fasadar med solceller eller planter: Eksperimentell studie av brannspreiing i fasadar med solceller (del 1) eller planter (del 2).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>EBOB - Fasadar med solceller eller planter: Eksperimentell studie av brannspreiing i fasadar med solceller (del 1) eller planter (del 2)
2024 (Norwegian)Report (Other academic)
Publisher
p. 83
Series
RISE Rapport ; 2024:98
Keywords
Photovoltaics, solar cells, PV, living walls, energy efficient buildings, green facades, green walls, green buildings, green facade systems
National Category
Civil Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-76335 (URN)
Note

Funding: Direktoratet for samfunnssikkerhet og beredskap (DSB) og Direktoratet forByggkvalitet (DiBK)

Available from: 2025-01-02 Created: 2025-01-02 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Sanfeliu Meliá, C., Stølen, R., Garberg Olsø, B. & Steen-Hansen, A. (2024). Energy production and storage in buildings. Fire safety challenges with Photovoltaics and Li-on battery systems.. In: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Nordic Fire & Safety Days: . Paper presented at 71 Nordic and international contributions presented at the Nordic Fire & Safety Days 2024 in Lund. (pp. 14).
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Energy production and storage in buildings. Fire safety challenges with Photovoltaics and Li-on battery systems.
2024 (English)In: BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Nordic Fire & Safety Days, 2024, p. 14-Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Other academic)
Series
RISE Rapport ; 2024:49
National Category
Materials Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-73646 (URN)10.23699/yns7-3n56 (DOI)978-91-89971-08-0 (ISBN)
Conference
71 Nordic and international contributions presented at the Nordic Fire & Safety Days 2024 in Lund.
Note

This work is supported by the Fire Research and InnovationCentre (FRIC), which is funded by all partners, in addition tofunding from the Research Council of Norway (RCN). Thework is also funded by the SafeBESS project funded by RCN,and by Green2050 - Centre for Green Shift in the BuiltEnvironment at NTNU.

Available from: 2024-06-24 Created: 2024-06-24 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0003-2164-940x

Search in DiVA

Show all publications