Change search
Link to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Publications (3 of 3) Show all publications
Osanloo, D., Mahlin, D., Bjerregaard, S., Bergenståhl, B. & Millqvist-Fureby, A. (2024). Exploring vacuum foam drying as an alternative to freeze-drying and spray drying for a human lipase. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 667, Article ID 124883.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Exploring vacuum foam drying as an alternative to freeze-drying and spray drying for a human lipase
Show others...
2024 (English)In: International Journal of Pharmaceutics, ISSN 0378-5173, E-ISSN 1873-3476, Vol. 667, article id 124883Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article compares and explores vacuum foam-drying as an alternative drying technology to freeze-drying and spray drying for a recombinant human lipase as the model protein. Materials characteristics such as structure, surface composition and the solid-state properties of the dry materials were compared and investigated. Moreover, the technical functionality in terms of reconstitution characteristics and the lipase stability were also investigated. The stability of the lipase was evaluated through activity measurements. Sucrose and dextran D40 (40 kDa) were used as matrix former and the surfactant α-dodecyl maltoside was used as surface active additive. The study demonstrated that the drying technique greatly influenced the material structure and composition which in turn affected the reconstitution characteristics. The lipase was overrepresented at the material surface in declining order spray-dried > vacuum foam-dried > freeze-dried. The lipase activity was retained up to 10 % lipase content in solids, but at 20 % lipase a loss of activity was observed for all drying techniques. Phase separation in the solid material may be an explanation. Vacuum foam-drying shows promise as an alternative drying technique for the lipase, and potentially other proteins. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V., 2024
Keywords
acid lipase; alpha dodecyl maltoside; dextran; maltose; sucrose; surfactant; triacylglycerol lipase; unclassified drug; Article; chemical procedures; controlled study; freeze drying; genetic recombination; human; nonhuman; phase separation; solid state; spray drying; surface property; vacuum foam drying
National Category
Materials Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-76168 (URN)10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124883 (DOI)2-s2.0-85207786733 (Scopus ID)
Note

. This research was funded by the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) and was carried out within the competence centre NextBioForm (grant number 2018-04730).

Available from: 2024-11-22 Created: 2024-11-22 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Osanloo, D., Mahlin, D., Bjerregaard, S., Bergenståhl, B. & Millqvist-Fureby, A. (2024). Formulation factors affecting foam properties during vacuum foam-drying. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 652, Article ID 123803.
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Formulation factors affecting foam properties during vacuum foam-drying
Show others...
2024 (English)In: International Journal of Pharmaceutics, ISSN 0378-5173, E-ISSN 1873-3476, Vol. 652, article id 123803Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This paper explores how vacuum foam-drying of a protein is influenced by formulation parameters by investigating the foam structure, physical properties of the foam, and the stability of the protein. Recombinant human bile salt-stimulated lipase was used as a model of a protein drug. The stability of the lipase was evaluated through activity measurements. Two disaccharides (sucrose and trehalose), strongly tending to an amorphous form, were used as matrix formers, and the physical properties were assessed through residual water content, glass transition temperature, and crystalline state. Moreover, some formulations included surfactants with different sizes and structures of the head group. The alkyl chain length was kept constant to only investigate the impact of the surfactant head group, in the presence of the lipase, on the foamability and surface coverage of the lipase. The study demonstrated that the lipase allowed for a dry, solid foam with a foam overrun of up to 2600 %. The wall thickness of the dry, solid foam was estimated to be 20–50 µm. Clear differences between sucrose and trehalose as matrix former were identified. The lipase showed no tendency to lose activity because of the drying and rehydration, despite a proportion of the lipase covering the surfaces of the dry material. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V., 2024
Keywords
Lipase, Matrix former, Protein formulations, Solid-state properties, Surface composition, Vacuum foam-drying
National Category
Chemical Engineering
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-71913 (URN)10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123803 (DOI)2-s2.0-85184501646 (Scopus ID)
Funder
Vinnova, 2018-04730
Note

'Correspondence Address: D. Tristan Osanlóo; RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Stockholm, Box 5604, SE-114 86, Sweden; The authors would like to thank Swedish Orphan Biovitrum for providing the lipase and Croda Nordica AB for the delivery of the surfactants. Dr. Stefan Ulvenlund (ENZA Biotech AB) is gratefully acknowledged for the delivery of surfactants and valuable discussions. This research was funded by the Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) and was carried out within the competence center NextBioForm (grant number 2018-04730).

Available from: 2024-02-22 Created: 2024-02-22 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Osanloo, D., Fransson, J., Bergenståhl, B. & Millqvist-Fureby, A. (2023). Effects of drying methods on physical properties and morphology of trehalose/mannitol mixtures. Drying Technology, 41(4), 503-522
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Effects of drying methods on physical properties and morphology of trehalose/mannitol mixtures
2023 (English)In: Drying Technology, ISSN 0737-3937, E-ISSN 1532-2300, Vol. 41, no 4, p. 503-522Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Solid-state properties of dried protein formulations are important for stability and functionality of the product. This study investigates how different drying technologies (freeze-drying with and without annealing, spray drying and spray-freeze drying) affect the structure and solid-state properties of a set of matrix formulations composed of trehalose (glass former) and mannitol (scaffolding agent) in five ratios. The dried materials were characterized using differential scanning calorimetry, thermogravimetric analysis, x-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy. The morphology of the dried matrix is determined by the drying technology and the composition. In all mixtures, mannitol partially dissolved in the amorphous trehalose, resulting in reduced glass transition temperature. At least 50% mannitol is required to achieve a scaffolding effect through crystallized mannitol. At 25% mannitol poor structural stability is obtained regardless of drying technology. Despite the vast differences in drying kinetics, all drying technologies resulted in similar amorphous content in the dried material. © 2022 The Author(s). 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor and Francis Ltd., 2023
Keywords
Freeze-drying, morphology, scaffolding, solid-state, spray drying, spray-freeze drying, Differential scanning calorimetry, Drug products, Glass, Glass transition, Mixtures, Polyols, Scanning electron microscopy, Stability, Thermogravimetric analysis, Drying methods, Drying technology, Freeze drying, Physical morphology, Protein formulation, Solid-state properties, Spray freeze drying, Spray-drying
National Category
Cell Biology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-60065 (URN)10.1080/07373937.2022.2103564 (DOI)2-s2.0-85135627393 (Scopus ID)
Note

This research was funded by Swedish Governmental Agency for Innovation Systems (VINNOVA) and was carried out within the NexBioForm Competence Centre.

Available from: 2022-09-05 Created: 2022-09-05 Last updated: 2025-09-23Bibliographically approved
Organisations
Identifiers
ORCID iD: ORCID iD iconorcid.org/0000-0001-7419-0829

Search in DiVA

Show all publications