Open this publication in new window or tab >>Show others...
2025 (English)In: Safety Science, ISSN 0925-7535, E-ISSN 1879-1042, Vol. 185.0Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
At 2 a.m. August 7th 2021, the emergency response centre of the city of Bergen, Norway, received a call from a private citizen reporting large flames appearing from a 4 floor 24 apartment municipal building housing people with drug addiction. Upon arrival 11 min later, the first responders faced a fire that had already spread and involved the whole building. To their surprise, all residents were already accounted for outside the building. The present study analyses why the fire developed that fast, why the automatic fire alarm system did not warn the emergency response centre early and how all occupants were accounted for in such a dramatic fire scenario. It turns out that the fire most likely started in one of the all-wooden floor balconies at ground level. The originally planned 1.2 m tall balcony glazing facing a public road had been substituted by wood to ensure privacy and prevent visibility. The balcony subdivision walls had 20 cm gaps at ceiling level. Analysis confirmed that this balcony construction, i.e., all-wooden and with gaps at the top of the division wall, contributed significantly both during the early fire development as well as to the very fast vertical and horizontal fire spread over the entire building façade. Post-fire interviews revealed that a significant number of occupants were awake this night, allowing them to promptly detect the fire in the building. A close-knit relationship network, including both friends and acquaintances, was of major importance regarding door-to-door alarming unaware residents about the immediate danger. From the investigations conducted after the fire it is quite clear that under different circumstances this fire could have resulted in multiple fatalities. Though the incident may be considered a success regarding the “no loss of lives” focus in Norwegian fire safety regulations, the study revealed weaknesses in balcony construction and use of materials as well as lack of exterior automatic fire detection and mitigation of external fires. The study revealed important learning points for future prevention of possibly far worse fire incidents, as well as the importance of a close-knit relationship network in a crisis situation
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V., 2025
Keywords
Balconies; Case study; Fire analysis; Fire safety; Human behaviour in fires; Investigation; Learning
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-80618 (URN)10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106782 (DOI)2-s2.0-85215387369 (Scopus ID)
Note
Funding text 1
We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Research Council of Norway and several partners through the Fire Research and Innovation Centre (www.fric.no). Research Council of Norway, program BRANNSIKKERHET, grant number 294649 . The work was also partly supported by Research Council of Norway grant numbers 298399 (DYNAMIC) and 301569 (BUILDER).
Funding text 2
The authors want to thank all members of the project group for their contributions to the analysis of this fire, with special thanks to Anna Karin Hermansen, Arild Hermansen and Kristen K. Opstad, and also the Bergen police and Bergen fire department for providing access to internal reports and access to the fire scene for inspection. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the Research Council of Norway, Norway and several partners through the Fire Research and Innovation Centre (www.fric.no). Research Council of Norway, program BRANNSIKKERHET, grant number 294649. The work was also partly supported by Research Council of Norway grant numbers 298993 (DYNAMIC) and 301569 (BUILDER).
2026-02-042026-02-042026-02-04Bibliographically approved