Change search
Refine search result
1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rows per page
  • 5
  • 10
  • 20
  • 50
  • 100
  • 250
Sort
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
  • Standard (Relevance)
  • Author A-Ö
  • Author Ö-A
  • Title A-Ö
  • Title Ö-A
  • Publication type A-Ö
  • Publication type Ö-A
  • Issued (Oldest first)
  • Issued (Newest first)
  • Created (Oldest first)
  • Created (Newest first)
  • Last updated (Oldest first)
  • Last updated (Newest first)
  • Disputation date (earliest first)
  • Disputation date (latest first)
Select
The maximal number of hits you can export is 250. When you want to export more records please use the Create feeds function.
  • 1.
    Sturges, Michael
    et al.
    RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy, RISE UK Ltd.
    Kay, Martin
    RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy, RISE UK Ltd.
    Johansson, Malin
    RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy, Papermaking and Packaging.
    BioPackLCA – Closing the gap: Extending LCA to reflect the sustainability contributions of bio-based packaging2019Report (Other academic)
    Abstract [en]

    Existing LCA methods (especially impact categories considered) do not always include some of the environmental interventions that are unique to bio-based materials. Subsequently, this report to investigates areas where LCA impact assessment methodology can be enhanced or expanded in order to fully account for the environmental advantages and disadvantages of bio-based packaging materials. The work focuses on impact assessment areas most pertinent to three of the highest-profile environmental policy objectives of the day, i.e. climate change, single-use plastics and microplastics generation. Subsequently, recommendations are made with regards to the application of the global warming potential impact category when conducting LCA studies comparing bio-based and other packaging materials, and proposals are presented for simplified impact categories for littering potential and microplastics generation potential.

1 - 1 of 1
CiteExportLink to result list
Permanent link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.35.8