EnglishSvenskaNorsk
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Explicit versus implicit finite element formulation in simulation of rolling
Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.
MEFOS − Stiftelsen för Metallurgisk Forskning.
1990 (English)In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology, ISSN 0924-0136, E-ISSN 1873-4774, Vol. 24, no 1, p. 85-94Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The computational efficiency of the explicit finite element code DYNA2D and the implicit code NIKE2D are compared in the case of simulation of rolling. It is found that the explicit code is preferable. The advantages of the explicit formulation will be even more pronounced in three-dimensional simulations. © 1990.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
1990. Vol. 24, no 1, p. 85-94
National Category
Materials Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-12762Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-0025568163OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-12762DiVA, id: diva2:972954
Available from: 2016-09-22 Created: 2016-09-22 Last updated: 2021-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Scopushttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/092401369090171P
In the same journal
Journal of Materials Processing Technology
Materials Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 72 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.45.0
|
WCAG