Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison and analysis of in-plane compression and bending failure in paperboard
RISE, Innventia.
RISE, Innventia.
2016 (English)In: Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal, ISSN 0283-2631, E-ISSN 2000-0669, Vol. 31, no 3, p. 432-440Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In-plane compression of paperboard, using long (LCT) and short compression test (SCT), and bend-ing, using the L&W creasability tester, have been ana-lyzed using three paperboards with similar strength prop-erties but different ZD profiles. The failure loads from the methods have been compared and the failure mechanisms analyzed. It was shown that at maximum bending moment from bending of samples using L=10 mm and L=50 mm, the SCT value and the maximum bending force from LCT all varied linearly with each other, indicating that same dam-age mechanism is activated. It was suggested that delamination cracks were initiated during SCT and LCT as well as during bending when plastic deformation had been initiated in an outer ply subjected to compressive stress. The plastic deformation would be initiated when the yield stress in the ply was reached, determined by an in-plane tensile test. When plastic deformation takes place, it will generate shear induced delamination cracks in locations with low shear strengths, e.g. in the interfaces or within the middle ply. The location depends on the material design strategy used in manufacturing the paper quality. To control the in-plane compression properties in pa-perboard one should control the yield stress (or possibly the failure stress) of the outer plies. Increased stress gives higher in-plane compression strength. Moreover, the interfaces strength is important, since increased interface strength (or lack of interfaces) prevents delamination.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 31, no 3, p. 432-440
National Category
Paper, Pulp and Fiber Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-12614Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84982190136OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-12614DiVA, id: diva2:971052
Note

cited By 0

Available from: 2016-09-15 Created: 2016-09-15 Last updated: 2017-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Scopus
By organisation
Innventia
In the same journal
Nordic Pulp & Paper Research Journal
Paper, Pulp and Fiber Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.34.0