Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Performance tests of a new non-invasive sensor unit and ultrasound electronics
Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa.
University of Florence, Italy.
Sika Services AG, Switzerland.
RISE, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut, SP Food and Bioscience, Structure Design.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7856-2324
2016 (English)In: Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, ISSN 0955-5986, E-ISSN 1873-6998, Vol. 48, p. 104-111Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Industrial applications involving pulsed ultrasound instrumentation require complete non-invasive setups due to high temperatures, pressures and possible abrasive fluids. Recently, new pulser-receiver electronics and a new sensor unit were developed by Flow-Viz. The complete sensor unit setup enables non-invasive Doppler measurements through high grade stainless steel. In this work a non-invasive sensor unit developed for one inch pipes (22.5 mm ID) and two inch pipes (48.4 mm ID) were evaluated. Performance tests were conducted using a Doppler string phantom setup and the Doppler velocity results were compared to the moving string target velocities. Eight different positions along the pipe internal diameter (22.5 mm) were investigated and at each position six speeds (0.1-0.6 m/s) were tested. Error differences ranged from 0.18 to 7.8% for the tested velocity range. The average accuracy of Doppler measurements for the 22.5 mm sensor unit decreased slightly from 1.3 to 2.3% across the ultrasound beam axis. Eleven positions were tested along the diameter of the 48.4 mm pipe (eight positions covered the pipe radius) and five speeds were tested (0.2-0.6 m/s). The average accuracy of Doppler measurements for the 48.4 mm sensor unit was between 2.4 and 5.9%, with the lowest accuracy at the point furthest away from the sensor unit. Error differences varied between 0.07 and 11.85% for the tested velocity range, where mostly overestimated velocities were recorded. This systematic error explains the higher average error difference percentage when comparing the 48.4 mm (2.4-5.9%) and 22.5 mm (1.3-2.3%) sensor unit performance. The overall performance of the combined Flow-Viz system (electronics, software, sensor) was excellent as similar or higher errors were typically reported in the medical field. This study has for the first time validated non-invasive Doppler measurements through high grade stainless steel pipes by using an advanced string phantom setup.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2016. Vol. 48, p. 104-111
Keywords [en]
Acoustic characterization, Doppler string phantom, Ultrasonic transducer, Ultrasonic Velocity Profiling (UVP), Doppler effect, Errors, Ultrasonic transducers, Velocity, Doppler, Doppler measurement, Non-invasive sensors, Pipe internal diameter, Pulsed ultrasounds, Ultrasonic velocity profiling, Ultrasound electronics, Stainless steel
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-135DOI: 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2015.08.013Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84940707465ISBN: 09555986 (ISSN) (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-135DiVA, id: diva2:932823
Available from: 2016-06-02 Created: 2016-06-02 Last updated: 2020-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84940707465&partnerID=40&md5=39c46cb338f9bf822ac655da430aea4c

Authority records

Wiklund, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wiklund, Johan
By organisation
Structure Design
In the same journal
Flow Measurement and Instrumentation
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 73 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf