Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Numerics for iles: Limiting algorithms
Show others and affiliations
2007 (English)Book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Large eddy simulation (LES) has emerged as the next-generation simulation tool for handling complex engineering, geophysical, astrophysical, and chemically reactive flows. As LES moves from being an academic tool to being a practical simulation strategy, the robustness of the LES solvers becomes a key issue to be concerned with, in conjunction with the classical and well-known issue of accuracy. For LES to be attractive for complex flows, the computational codes must be readily capable of handling complex geometries. Today, most LES codes use hexahedral elements; the grid-generation process is therefore cumbersome and time consuming. In the future, the use of unstructured grids, as used in Reynolds-averaged NavierâStokes (RANS) approaches, will also be necessary for LES. This will particularly challenge the development of high-order unstructured LES solvers. Because it does not require explicit filtering, Implicit LES (ILES) has some advantages over conventional LES; however, numerical requirements and issues are otherwise virtually the same for LES and ILES. In this chapterwe discuss an unstructured finite-volume methodology for both conventional LES and ILES, that is particularly suited for ILES. We believe that the next generation of practical computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models will involve structured and unstructured LES, using high-order flux-reconstruction algorithms and taking advantage of their built-in subgrid-scale (SGS) models. ILES based on functional reconstruction of the convective fluxes by use of high-resolution hybrid methods is the subject of this chapter. We use modified equation analysis (MEA) to show that the leading-order truncation error terms introduced by such methods provide implicit SGS models similar in form to those of conventional mixed SGS models.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press , 2007. Vol. 9780521869829
Keywords [en]
Finite volume method; Large eddy simulation, Complex engineering; Computational codes; Flux reconstruction; Hexahedral elements; Leading-order truncation errors; Modified equation analysis; Simulation strategies; Subgrid scale models, Computational fluid dynamics
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-72614DOI: 10.1017/9780511618604.006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84928434960ISBN: 9780511618604 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-72614DiVA, id: diva2:1851737
Available from: 2024-04-15 Created: 2024-04-15 Last updated: 2024-04-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Liefvendahl, Mattias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Liefvendahl, Mattias
Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 8 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf