System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Love or Hate?: Share or Split? Privacy-Preserving Training Using Split Learning and Homomorphic Encryption
Tampere University, Finland.
Tampere University, Finland.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Digital Systems, Data Science. Tampere University, Finland.
Tampere University, Finland; Nokia Bell Labs, Finland.
2023 (English)In: 2023 20th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST), Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2023, p. 1-7Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Split learning (SL) is a new collaborative learning technique that allows participants, e.g. a client and a server, to train machine learning models without the client sharing raw data. In this setting, the client initially applies its part of the machine learning model on the raw data to generate activation maps and then sends them to the server to continue the training process. Previous works in the field demonstrated that reconstructing activation maps could result in privacy leakage of client data. In addition to that, existing mitigation techniques that overcome the privacy leakage of SL prove to be significantly worse in terms of accuracy. In this paper, we improve upon previous works by constructing a protocol based on U-shaped SL that can operate on homomorphically encrypted data. More precisely, in our approach, the client applies homomorphic encryption on the activation maps before sending them to the server, thus protecting user privacy. This is an important improvement that reduces privacy leakage in comparison to other SL-based works. Finally, our results show that, with the optimum set of parameters, training with HE data in the U-shaped SL setting only reduces accuracy by 2.65% compared to training on plaintext. In addition, raw training data privacy is preserved.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2023. p. 1-7
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-68563DOI: 10.1109/PST58708.2023.10320153OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-68563DiVA, id: diva2:1819094
Conference
2023 20th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)
Note

This work was funded by the HARPOCRATES EU research project (No. 101069535) and the Technology Innovation Institute (TII), UAE, for the project ARROWSMITH

Available from: 2023-12-13 Created: 2023-12-13 Last updated: 2024-04-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
Data Science
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 98 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf