Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vertical rhizome disking to reduce Elymus repens (quackgrass) abundance in grass-clover leys
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Food. NIBIO Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7081-1277
NIBIO Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Norway; Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway.
NIBIO Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research, Norway.
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
2023 (English)In: Crop Protection, ISSN 0261-2194, E-ISSN 1873-6904, Vol. 172, article id 106301Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Elymus repens is a problematic perennial weed in annual crops, grasslands and leys. Rhizome fragmentation by vertical disking can potentially reduce E. repens abundance with minimal tillage, but data are lacking on its efficiency in forage production. In a two-year study (2017–2018, 2018–2019) conducted in two forage grass-clover leys that were mostly weed-free except for large E. repens populations, this study examined effects on forage yield, botanical composition, and E. repens rhizome biomass of rhizome fragmentation at significant growth initiation in spring (early rhizome fragmentation, ERF) and/or when conditions allowed after the first forage cut (late rhizome fragmentation, LRF). Cold, wet springs and hard, dry soil in summer delayed treatment in both treatment years, to late spring (ERF) and late summer/early autumn (LRF). In the treatment year, ERF reduced first-cut forage yield by 44% compared with no rhizome fragmentation, while LRF decreased second- and third-cut yield by 24% and 53%, respectively. In the year after treatment, ERF increased total forage yield by on average 10%, while LRF had no effect. Over both years, combined forage yield was reduced by 11% by ERF and 4% by LRF. Both treatments reduced E. repens rhizome biomass, but inconsistently (ERF by 25% in one year only, LRF by 24% at one of two sites). ERF reduced E. repens incidence in forage by 10% in the treatment year, but had no effect in the following year. Thus, rhizome fragmentation by vertical disking can reduce E. repens abundance in grass-clover leys, but the effect is inconsistent and forage yield can be impaired, especially in swards with much E. repens. Moreover, disking is hampered by hard, dry soil conditions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. Vol. 172, article id 106301
Keywords [en]
Organic agriculture, Perennial plant, Mechanical weed control, IPM, Agroecology, Ecological intensification
National Category
Agricultural Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-64927DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106301OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-64927DiVA, id: diva2:1764862
Note

The study received financial support from SLU Ekoforsk and the Research Council of Norway through the program FFL-JA and the project “Smart renewal of long-term grassland: Towards higher productivity and profitability (LONGTERMGRASS)” (project no. 255176). The authors would like to thank SLU Lövsta field research station for experiment management, Kristin Thored and her team for sampling and analyses, and the Kverneland Group and the project “Rootcutter – Innovative Technology for Weed Control” (project no. 256441/E50) for making the rhizome fragmentation prototype available for the experiments.

Available from: 2023-06-09 Created: 2023-06-09 Last updated: 2023-06-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2764 kB)54 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2764 kBChecksum SHA-512
b557800ab2a84517a3d88db0b589475e7d4c874f76c269554403608f237e42419ff83b86a8fe27a096f1d25905bf15ed2ef010ceea49ba49bb51fb916d1c8390
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Ringselle, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringselle, Björn
By organisation
Agriculture and Food
In the same journal
Crop Protection
Agricultural Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 54 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 200 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf