Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sorting technologies: Case study about a MSW sorting facility in Norway - IVAR
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Built Environment, System Transition and Service Innovation.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5745-5960
IVAR.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Built Environment, Infrastructure and concrete technology.
2022 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The IVAR plant combines post-sorting of residual waste with recycling of some of the plastic waste fractions. At the plant five different fraction of plastics, four fractions of paper, bio- waste, glass, and metal packaging are separated. In total 83.2 % by weight of the incoming waste is sent to energy recovery (WtE) and 16.8 wt% is recovered for material recycling. It is estimated that approx. 82 wt% of the plastic in the waste is separated. Today they also have spare capacity to receive more waste for sorting, however the costs are relatively high and the economic incentive from the sales of the sorted materials are not enough. The largest renumeration comes from the Norwegian producer responsibility schemes for sorting plastic, metal packaging and beverage cartons.

The bottle neck of the recycling industry with the current state of the art is the quality of the plastic waste. Only part of the plastic waste is suitable for recycling (have a market for the recycled material). New solutions for both plastic sorting and recycling is needed to increase the impact and circularity from the recycling. It will be crucial to find solutions for low quality and mixed plastic materials. There also need to be measures put in place to create a market pull for the recycled material.

While all the recycled material generates positive climate effects, the recycled plastic generates double gains. It reduces the emissions for the production of virgin plastics and at the same time it reduces the direct fossil CO2 emissions generated by the WtE plant. Considering upcoming regulations in Norway, with increased CO2 taxes, the investments for more residual sorting plants in Norway is likely to increase.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IEA Bioenergy , 2022.
National Category
Bioenergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-64905ISBN: 979-12-80907-12-7 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-64905DiVA, id: diva2:1760844
Available from: 2023-05-31 Created: 2023-05-31 Last updated: 2023-05-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1341 kB)69 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1341 kBChecksum SHA-512
f6d3ce8ce3524311cfc1a5af146a435bc588d3178564c983883e8a022c55f1ac5e9c7c88ce9bf0308ad08f1f30b86c0cd249eea97ce1d453add86e5711e47c11
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Edo, Mar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edo, Mar
By organisation
System Transition and Service InnovationInfrastructure and concrete technology
Bioenergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 83 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 410 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf