Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of machining performance of stainless steel 316L produced by selective laser melting and electron beam melting
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Manufacturing Processes. Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9288-3872
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Manufacturing Processes.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2991-2911
Mid Sweden University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Procedia CIRP, Elsevier B.V. , 2022, p. 72-77Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Powder bed fusion processes based additively manufactured SS 316L components fall short of surface integrity requirements needed for optimal functional performance. Hence, machining is required to achieve dimensional accuracy and to enhance surface integrity characteristics. This research is focused on comparing the material removal performance of 316L produced by PBF-LB (laser) and PBF-EB (electron beam) in terms of tool wear and surface integrity. The results showed comparable surface topography and residual stress profiles. While the hardness profiles revealed work hardening at the surface where PBF-LB specimens being more susceptible to work hardening. The investigation also revealed differences in the progress of the tool wear when machining specimens produced with either PBF-LB or PBF-EB. .

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2022. p. 72-77
Keywords [en]
Additive manufacturing, electron beam melting, machining, selective laser melting, surface integrity, Additives, Austenitic stainless steel, Cutting tools, Electron beams, Strain hardening, Wear of materials, Electron-beam melting, Fusion process, Machining performance, Powder bed, Process-based, SS 316L, Stainless steel (316L), Tool wear, Topography
National Category
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-62606DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.10.052Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85145230165OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-62606DiVA, id: diva2:1730391
Conference
10th CIRP Global Web Conference on Material Aspects of Manufacturing Processes, 25 October 2022 through 27 October 2022
Note

Funding text 1: Amir-Reza Shahab is acknowledged for initial work. This study is a collaboration between RISE AB, the Centre for Metal Cutting Research and the Centre for Additive Manufacture – Metal at Chalmers University of Technology, and Mid Sweden University. We thank Swedish oG vernmental Agency of Innovation Systems (Vinnova 2016-05175) for funding. Rolf Ahlman at RISE AB and Dr. Sinuhe at Sandvik Coromant are thanked for their support with turning tests and providing the respective machining tools.

Available from: 2023-01-24 Created: 2023-01-24 Last updated: 2023-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Hosseini, SeyedHolmberg, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hosseini, SeyedHolmberg, Jonas
By organisation
Manufacturing Processes
Manufacturing, Surface and Joining Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 87 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf