Indoor PM2.5 from occupied residences in Sweden caused higher inflammation in mice compared to outdoor PM2.5Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Indoor Air, ISSN 0905-6947, E-ISSN 1600-0668, Vol. 32, no 12, article id e13177Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
We spend most of our time indoors; however, little is known about the effects of exposure to aerosol particles indoors. We aimed to determine differences in relative toxicity and physicochemical properties of PM2.5 collected simultaneously indoors (PM2.5 INDOOR) and outdoors (PM2.5 OUTDOOR) in 15 occupied homes in southern Sweden. Collected particles were extracted from filters, pooled (indoor and outdoor separately), and characterized for chemical composition and endotoxins before being tested for toxicity in mice via intratracheal instillation. Various endpoints including lung inflammation, genotoxicity, and acute-phase response in lung and liver were assessed 1, 3, and 28 days post-exposure. Chemical composition of particles used in toxicological assessment was compared to particles analyzed without extraction. Time-resolved particle mass and number concentrations were monitored. PM2.5 INDOOR showed higher relative concentrations (μg mg−1) of metals, PAHs, and endotoxins compared to PM2.5 OUTDOOR. These differences may be linked to PM2.5 INDOOR causing significantly higher lung inflammation and lung acute-phase response 1 day post-exposure compared to PM2.5 OUTDOOR and vehicle controls, respectively. None of the tested materials caused genotoxicity. PM2.5 INDOOR displayed higher relative toxicity than PM2.5 OUTDOOR under the studied conditions, that is, wintertime with reduced air exchange rates, high influence of indoor sources, and relatively low outdoor concentrations of PM. Reducing PM2.5 INDOOR exposure requires reduction of both infiltration from outdoors and indoor-generated particles. © 2022 The Authors.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley and Sons Inc , 2022. Vol. 32, no 12, article id e13177
Keywords [en]
aerosol, home, indoor/outdoor ratio, physicochemical characteristics, PM2.5, real-life exposure, toxicity
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-62577DOI: 10.1111/ina.13177Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85145061636OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-62577DiVA, id: diva2:1729748
Note
Funding details: Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, 2016‐0079, 942‐2015‐1029; Funding details: Energimyndigheten, 43092‐1; Funding text 1: This work was financed by the Swedish Research Council FORMAS (Projects Dnr 942‐2015‐1029 and 2016‐0079), the Swedish Energy Agency (43092‐1) and by FFIKA, Focused Research Effort on Chemicals in the Working Environment from the Danish Government. We would like to express our gratitude to participants who let us perform the measurements in their homes. The technical assistance from Ryszard Wierzbicki, Patrik Nilsson, Anne Abildtrup, Michael Guldbrandsen, Eva Terrida, Noor Irmam, Anne Karin Asp, Yasmin Akhtar, and Sandro Lucciola was greatly appreciated. We would like to thank our partners LKF, Kraftringen, and Lunds kommun. The Grolman Group (Grolman Nordic Speciality Chemicals, Oslo, Norway) is acknowledged for providing the CB materials.
2023-01-232023-01-232023-11-01Bibliographically approved