Scaling of wetted-transom resistance for improved full-scale ship performance predictions
2022 (English)In: Ocean Engineering, ISSN 0029-8018, E-ISSN 1873-5258, Vol. 266, article id 112590Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Determining a ship's propulsive power is a critical stage in the design phase in which the evaluation of the stern plays a crucial role. Different flow regimes can be observed depending on the position and shape of the transom. This paper investigates the wetted-transom flow characteristics and their implications on the 1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Method. In the case of flow separation, such as the wetted-transom flow, the current ITTC-78 procedure does not provide an alternative method. Therefore, two alternative methods were proposed based on the investigations of CFD computations on seven hull forms. The firstly proposed method is a combined EFD&CFD method called the two form factor method. It requires CFD computations in model and full-scale, and it can handle any case of flow separation, including the wetted-transom flow. The second proposed method is an empirical correction formula for the hulls with a wetted-transom flow. Finally, the full-scale speed-power relations between the speed trials and the full-scale predictions from the two alternative methods and the standard ITTC-78 method were presented. It is observed that the two suggested methods considerably improve the correlation between the predictions and the speed trials. © 2022 The Author(s)
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2022. Vol. 266, article id 112590
Keywords [en]
CFD, Combined CFD/EFD methods, Form factor, Ship resistance, Transom flow, Wetted-transom
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-60426DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.112590Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85139019055OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-60426DiVA, id: diva2:1704817
Note
Funding details: Energimyndigheten, 2020-018759; Funding text 1: This research was funded by Energimyndigheten, the Swedish Energy Agency , grant 2020-018759 , and the computational resources provided by SSPA Sweden AB. The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
2022-10-192022-10-192024-02-15Bibliographically approved