Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Instrument tables equipped with local unidirectional airflow units reduce bacterial contamination during orthopedic implant surgery in an operating room with a displacement ventilation system
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, Product Realisation Methodology. University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2821-4142
University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Infection Prevention in Practice, E-ISSN 2590-0889, Vol. 4, no 3, article id 100222Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Airborne bacteria present in the operating room may be a cause of surgical site infection, either contaminating the surgical wound directly, or indirectly via e.g. surgical instruments. The aim of this study was to evaluate if instrument and assistant tables equipped with local unidirectional airflow reduce bacterial contamination of the instrument area to ultra clean levels, during orthopedic implant surgery in an operating room with displacement ventilation. Methods: Local airflow units of instrument and assistant tables were either active or inactive. Colony forming units were sampled intraoperatively from the air above the instruments and from instrument dummies. A minimum of three air samples and two-three samples from instrument dummies were taken during each surgery. Samples were incubated on agar for total aerobic bacterial count. The mean air and instrument contamination during each surgery was calculated and used to analyze the difference in contamination depending on use of local airflow or not. All procedures were performed in the same OR. Results: 188 air and 124 instrument samples were collected during 48 orthopedic implant procedures. Analysis showed that local unidirectional airflow above the surgical instruments significantly reduced the bacterial count in the air above assistant table (P<0.001) and instrument table (P=0.002), as well as on the instrument dummies from the assistant table (P=0.001). Conclusions: Instrumentation tables equipped with local unidirectional airflow protect the surgical instruments from bacterial contamination during orthopedic implant surgery and may therefore reduce the risk of indirect wound contamination. © 2022 The Authors

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2022. Vol. 4, no 3, article id 100222
Keywords [en]
Bacterial count, Colony forming unit, Instrument table, Orthopedic surgery, Surgical instruments, Unidirectional airflow
National Category
Biological Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-60007DOI: 10.1016/j.infpip.2022.100222Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85131753480OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-60007DiVA, id: diva2:1701825
Note

 Funding details: Västra Götalandsregionen, RUN 2018–00426; Funding details: VINNOVA, 2018–00436; Funding text 1: Financed by VINNOVA (2018–00436), and The Region of Västra Götaland, Regional development (RUN 2018–00426).

Available from: 2022-10-07 Created: 2022-10-07 Last updated: 2024-04-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Seth Caous, Josefin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Seth Caous, Josefin
By organisation
Product Realisation Methodology
In the same journal
Infection Prevention in Practice
Biological Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 15 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf