Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rhizome fragmentation by vertical disks reduces Elymus repens growth and benefits italian ryegrass-white clover crops
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden: NIBIO, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7081-1277
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Frontiers in Plant Science, E-ISSN 1664-462X, Vol. 8, article id 2243Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Tillage controls perennial weeds, such as Elymus repens, partly because it fragments their underground storage organs. However, tillage is difficult to combine with a growing crop, which limits its application. The aim of this study was to evaluate how soil vertical cutting with minimum soil disturbance and mowing affect the growth and competitive ability of E. repens in a grass–clover crop. A tractor-drawn prototype with vertical disks was used to fragment E. repens rhizomes with minimal soil and crop disturbance. In experiments performed in 2014 and 2015 at a field site close to Uppsala, Sweden, the rhizomes were fragmented before crop sowing (ERF), during crop growth (LRF), or both (ERF+LRF). Fragmentation was combined with repeated mowing (yes/no) and four companion crop treatments (none, Italian ryegrass, white clover, and grass/clover mixture). The results showed that in the grass–clover crop, rhizome fragmentation reduced E. repens rhizome biomass production and increased Italian ryegrass shoot biomass. ERF and LRF both reduced E. repens rhizome biomass by about 38% compared with the control, while ERF+LRF reduced it by 63%. Italian ryegrass shoot biomass was increased by 78% by ERF, 170% by LRF and 200% by ERF+LRF. Repeated mowing throughout the experiment reduced E. repens rhizome biomass by about 75%. Combining repeated mowing with rhizome fragmentation did not significantly increase the control effect compared to mowing alone. We concluded that rhizome fragmentation using vertical disks can be used both before sowing and during crop growth to enhance the controlling effect of grass–clover crops on E. repens. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A. , 2018. Vol. 8, article id 2243
Keywords [en]
Cutting, Elytrigia repens, Intercrop, Lolium multiflorum, Mechanical weed control, Mowing, Perennial weed, Trifolium repens
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-60098DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02243Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85041603054OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-60098DiVA, id: diva2:1694093
Note

 Funding details: Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale School of Medicine; Funding details: European Commission; Funding details: Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; Funding details: Seventh Framework Programme, FP7; Funding text 1: Funding for this work was provided by SLU EkoForsk, Sweden and the FertilCrop project (funded by partners of the FP7 ERA-NET project, Core Organic Plus and the European Commission). The authors would like to thank the Kverneland Group and the project “Rootcutter – Innovative Technology for Weed Control” (project number 256441/E50) for making the rhizome fragmentation prototype available for the experiments.

Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2024-01-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ringselle, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringselle, Björn
In the same journal
Frontiers in Plant Science
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf