Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Effects of renewal time, taproot cutting, ploughing practice, false seedbed and companion crop on docks (Rumex spp.) when renewing grassland
NIBIO, Norway.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7081-1277
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: European Journal of Agronomy, ISSN 1161-0301, E-ISSN 1873-7331, Vol. 103, p. 54-62Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Docks (Rumex spp.) are a considerable problem in grassland production worldwide. We investigated how different cultural management techniques affected dock populations during grassland renewal: (I) renewal time, (II) companion crop, (III) false seedbed, (IV) taproot cutting (V), plough skimmer and (VI) ploughing depth. Three factorial split-split plot experiments were carried out in Norway in 2007–2008 (three locations), 2008–2009 (one location) and 2009 (one location). After grassland renewal, more dock plants emerged from seeds than from roots. Summer renewal resulted in more dock seed and root plants than spring renewal. Adding a spring barley companion crop to the grassland crop often reduced dock density and biomass. A false seedbed resulted in 71% fewer dock seed plants following summer renewal, but tended to increase the number of dock plants after spring renewal. In some instances, taproot cutting resulted in less dock biomass, but the effect was weak and inconsistent, and if ploughing was shallow (16 cm) or omitted, it instead increased dock root plant emergence. Fewer root plants emerged after deep ploughing (24 cm) compared to shallow ploughing, and a plough skimmer tended to reduce the number further. We conclude that a competitive companion crop can assist in controlling both dock seed and root plants, but it is more important that the renewal time is favourable to the main crop. Taproot cutting in conjunction with ploughing is not an effective way to reduce dock root plants, but ploughing is more effective if it is deep and a skimmer is used. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2019. Vol. 103, p. 54-62
Keywords [en]
Cover crop, Plow skimmer, Plowing depth, Rumex crispus, Rumex longifolius, Rumex obtusifolius, biomass, cutting (process), experimental study, grass, grassland, pest control, plowing, root, seed set, Norway, Hordeum, Rumex, Spermatophyta
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-60096DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.11.005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85057874537OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-60096DiVA, id: diva2:1694088
Note

Funding details: Norges Forskningsråd, 176812; Funding details: National Institute of Biomedical Innovation, NIBIO; Funding text 1: The project was financed by the Norwegian Research Council (project number 176812: Control of docks (Rumex spp.) in organic fodder production - a true bottleneck in organic farmed branded dairy and meat products) and by NIBIO. The authors would like to thank Marit Helgheim for her contribution in the field and the Kverneland Group Norway for assistance with the root cutting implements. The authors would also like to thank editor Prof. Peltonen-Sainio and two anonymous reviewers for their comments during the review process.; Funding text 2: The project was financed by the Norwegian Research Council (project number 176812 : Control of docks (Rumex spp.) in organic fodder production - a true bottleneck in organic farmed branded dairy and meat products) and by NIBIO . The authors would like to thank Marit Helgheim for her contribution in the field and the Kverneland Group Norway for assistance with the root cutting implements. The authors would also like to thank editor Prof. Peltonen-Sainio and two anonymous reviewers for their comments during the review process.

Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2023-05-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ringselle, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringselle, Björn
In the same journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 16 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf