Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Combining mechanical control of couch grass (Elymus repens L.) with reduced tillage in early autumn and cover crops to decrease nitrogen and phosphorus leaching
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7081-1277
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
2015 (English)In: Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, ISSN 1385-1314, E-ISSN 1573-0867, Vol. 102, no 3, p. 383-396Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Methods for control of couch grass (Elymus repens L.) with reduced tillage and cover crops to achieve low risk of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) leaching were investigated. Treatments with reduced post-harvest tillage (one or two passes with duckfoot cultivator), hoeing between rows in combination with a cover crop, and a cover crop mown twice during autumn were compared with treatments with conventional disc cultivation and the control without tillage or cover crop. The study was conducted on a sandy soil in Sweden with measurements of N and P leaching. A 2-year experimental protocol was used, repeated twice. Treatments were implemented in the first year, and effects on couch grass (shoot density, shoot and rhizome biomass) were measured during autumn and in the second year. Significant effects of a single duckfoot cultivation and cover crop strategies were observed on couch grass shoot density in autumn but persistent effects were not verified. In conclusion, a single cultivation after harvest instead of repeated reduced the risk of N leaching and a cover crop in combination with hoeing or mowing effectively reduced it. Repeated cultivations resulted in mean annual N leaching of 26 kg N ha−1 compared with 20 kg in the treatment with one cultivation, 17 kg in the control, 16 and 12 kg in cover crop treatments with mowing and hoeing, respectively. The P leaching was small (0.04–0.09 P ha−1 year−1), but there were indications of increased P drainage water concentrations in the treatment with a cover crop which was mown. © 2015, The Author(s).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Kluwer Academic Publishers , 2015. Vol. 102, no 3, p. 383-396
Keywords [en]
Competition, Elymus repens, Leaching, Nutrients, Reduced tillage, Weed control, autumn, cover crop, cultivation, erosion control, grass, mechanical control, perennial plant, persistence, soil erosion, tillage, Sweden
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-60102DOI: 10.1007/s10705-015-9712-7Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84937520250OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-60102DiVA, id: diva2:1694040
Note

Funding details: Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, SLU; Funding details: Stiftelsen Lantbruksforskning, SLF; Funding text 1: This study received financial support from the Swedish Farmers’ Foundation for Agricultural Research and from the SLU Ekoforsk research programme at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. The authors thank Johannes Forkman for much valued advice and discussions regarding the statistical analyses.

Available from: 2022-09-08 Created: 2022-09-08 Last updated: 2023-05-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ringselle, Björn

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ringselle, Björn
In the same journal
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf