Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of skin reactions during proton beam radiotherapy – Patient-reported versus clinician-reported
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Safety and Transport, Measurement Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9443-8473
University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Sweden.
Örebro University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology, ISSN 2405-6324, Vol. 19, p. 11-17Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Skin reaction is a common side-effect of radiotherapy and often only assessed as clinician-reported outcome (CRO). The aim was to examine and compare patient-reported outcome (PRO) of skin reactions with CRO for signs of acute skin reactions for patients with primary brain tumour receiving proton beam radiotherapy (PBT). A further aim was to explore patients’ experiences of the skin reactions. Methods: Acute skin reactions were assessed one week after start of treatment, mid-treatment and end of treatment among 253 patients with primary brain tumour who underwent PBT. PRO skin reactions were assessed with the RSAS and CRO according to the RTOG scale. Fleiss’ kappa was performed to measure the inter-rater agreement of the assessments of skin reactions. Results: The results showed a discrepancy between PRO and CRO acute skin reactions. Radiation dose was associated with increased skin reactions, but no correlations were seen for age, gender, education, occupation, other treatment or smoking. There was a poor agreement between patients and clinicians (κ = −0.016) one week after the start of PBT, poor (κ = −0.045) to (κ = 0.396) moderate agreement at mid treatment and poor (κ = −0.010) to (κ = 0.296) moderate agreement at end of treatment. Generally, patients’ symptom distress toward skin reactions was low at all time points. Conclusion: The poor agreement between PRO and CRO shows that the patient needs to be involved in assessments of skin reactions for a more complete understanding of skin reactions due to PBT. This may also improve patient experience regarding involvement in their own care. © 2021 The Author(s)

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ireland Ltd , 2021. Vol. 19, p. 11-17
Keywords [en]
Clinician-reported, Patient-reported outcome, Primary brain tumour, Proton therapy, Radiotherapy, Skin reaction
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-55833DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.05.001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85109130725OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-55833DiVA, id: diva2:1587026
Note

Funding details: Swedish Cancer Foundation; Funding text 1: This research was funded by grants ( CAN2015/428 and CAN2016/809 ) from the Swedish Cancer Foundation .

Available from: 2021-08-23 Created: 2021-08-23 Last updated: 2023-11-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Möllerberg, Marie-Louise

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Möllerberg, Marie-Louise
By organisation
Measurement Technology
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 36 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf