Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Protective effect of a reverse membrane bioreactor against toluene and naphthalene in anaerobic digestion.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Built Environment, Energy and Resources. University of Borås, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6886-4994
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Biotechnology and applied biochemistry, ISSN 0885-4513, E-ISSN 1470-8744, Vol. 69, no 3, p. 1267-1274Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Raw syngas contains tar contaminants including toluene and naphthalene, which inhibit its conversion to methane. Cell encasement in a hydrophilic reverse membrane bioreactor (RMBR) could protect the cells from hydrophobic contaminants. This study aimed to investigate the inhibition of toluene and naphthalene and the effect of using RMBR. In this work, toluene and napthalene were added at concentrations of 0.5 - 1.0 and 0.1 - 0.2 g/L in batch operation. In continuous operation, concentration of 0 - 6.44 g/L for toluene and 0 - 1.28 g/L for napthalene were studied. The results showed that no inhibition was observed in batch operation for toluene and naphthalene at concentrations up to 1 and 0.2 g/L, respectively. In continuous operation of free cell bioreactors (FCBR), inhibition of toluene and naphthalene started at 2.05 g/L and 0.63 g/L, respectively. When they were present simultaneously, inhibition of toluene and naphthalene occurred at concentrations of 3.14 g/L and 0.63 g/L, respectively. In continuous RMBRs, no inhibition for toluene and less inhibition for naphthalene were observed, resulting in higher methane production from RMBR than that of FCBR. These results indicated that RMBR system gave a better protection effect against inhibitors compared to FCBR. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2022. Vol. 69, no 3, p. 1267-1274
Keywords [en]
anaerobic digestion, naphthalene, protective effect, reverse membrane bioreactor, syngas contaminants, toluene
National Category
Other Industrial Biotechnology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-55449DOI: 10.1002/bab.2218PubMedID: 34196033Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85110966313OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-55449DiVA, id: diva2:1579513
Available from: 2021-07-09 Created: 2021-07-09 Last updated: 2023-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Chandolias, Konstantinos

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Chandolias, Konstantinos
By organisation
Energy and Resources
In the same journal
Biotechnology and applied biochemistry
Other Industrial Biotechnology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 67 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf