Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Video quality based on a user study with video professionals for Video Assisted Refereeing (VAR) Systems
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Digital Systems, Industrial Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5060-9402
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Digital Systems, Industrial Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9971-2432
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Digital Systems, Industrial Systems.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9964-7792
2021 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This document describes a user experiment with the purpose of finding a baseline quality that is suitable for system and a database for training and evaluating the objective quality measurement methods suitable for assessing the video quality of VAR systems. 

A user experiment was performed involving 25 Swedish video experts. Three different video formats were incorporated 1080p, 1080i and 540i. The degradations were in most cased done using encoding with Motion JPEG (MJPEG) and H.264 in the bitrate range from 80 Mbit/s down to 10 Mbit/s. 

MJPEG loses quality very fast and already at 80 Mbit/s it has significantly lower quality than the uncompressed reference and then for even lower bitrates the quality falls quickly to bad. On the other hand, H.264 was not found to be significant different from the uncompressed reference until the bitrate had dropped to 10 Mbit/s for 1080p. For 1080i 20 Mbit/s was also weakly and for 540i 20 Mbit/s was significantly lower for some of the scaling methods. For 1080i the deinterlacing requires careful consideration, since the deinterlacing scheme introduced received very low quality scores. For the scaling scheme lanczos was the best and bilinear the worst. 

Requirement levels on bitrate and the encoders MJPEG and H.264 based on this experiment•    MJPEG require more than 120 Mbit/s•    H.264 require more than 50 Mbit/s

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. , p. 33
Series
RISE Rapport ; 2021:29
National Category
Signal Processing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-52577DOI: 10.23699/79ja-gj68ISBN: 978-91-89385-14-6 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-52577DiVA, id: diva2:1535451
Available from: 2021-03-09 Created: 2021-03-09 Last updated: 2023-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4173 kB)486 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4173 kBChecksum SHA-512
8c5dec338aed4dd903b1782ecca7afbce41f54638c11efafadc75da221f3b22f22bae273720c0ea3f06f68197db99095ebc026bdb7c8d2199b63eb40debb89a8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Brunnström, KjellDjupsjöbacka, AndersAndrén, Börje

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brunnström, KjellDjupsjöbacka, AndersAndrén, Börje
By organisation
Industrial Systems
Signal Processing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 487 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 376 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf