Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Spray characterization of twin fluid externalmix atomization of pyrolysis oil
RISE, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut, SP Energy Technology Center.
RISE, SP – Sveriges Tekniska Forskningsinstitut, SP Energy Technology Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4286-200x
2012 (English)In: Atomization and sprays, ISSN 1044-5110, E-ISSN 1936-2684, Vol. 22, no 11, p. 897-919Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The development of biomass-based energy conversion technologies has gradually been intensified throughout the last decade. The route based on pressurized entrained flow biomass gasification has an important role in this development. However, the issues of logistics and handling of the biomass requires thorough and detailed process integration studies in order to find optimal ways of imple- mentation of this technology. An interesting approach is to liquefy the biomass via fast pyrolysis to produce a bio-oil, which then could be disintegrated into the gasifier. In order to better understand how a generic type of externally gas-assisted atomizer performs for pyrolysis oil, spray characteriza- tion based on high-speed photography and case-independent image analysis were performed. Three different parameters were varied in order to study the atomization performance for the considered nozzle: The ambient pressure, the pyrolysis oil temperature, and the length of external extension of the prefilming center bluff body in the nozzle. It was found that an increase in ambient pressure and corresponding load as well as an extension of the center bluff body of the nozzle led to degradation in atomization performance. On the other hand, a moderate temperature increase that affects the fluid properties in a favorable way improved the atomization performance. In all considered cases for the tested nozzle, a notable fraction of the droplets in the spray were found in the large-size tail of the size distributions and it is uncertain whether this may have an effect on the fuel conversion in the gasification process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 22, no 11, p. 897-919
Keywords [en]
Bluff body, Image analysis, Pressure, Shadowgraphy, Atomization performance, Biomass Gasification, Energy conversion technologies, Gasification process, Moderate temperature, Spray characterizations, Atomization, Atomizers, Biomass, Gasification, High speed photography, Spray nozzles
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-51049DOI: 10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013006240Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84876405353OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-51049DiVA, id: diva2:1515688
Available from: 2021-01-11 Created: 2021-01-11 Last updated: 2021-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Marklund, Magnus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Marklund, Magnus
By organisation
SP Energy Technology Center
In the same journal
Atomization and sprays
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf