Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A novel in vitro injury model based on microcontact printing demonstrates negative effects of hydrogen peroxide on axonal regeneration both in absence and presence of glia
Uppsala University, Sweden.
RISE, Swedish ICT, Acreo.
RISE, Swedish ICT, Acreo.
Uppsala University, Sweden.
2013 (English)In: Journal of Neurotrauma, ISSN 0897-7151, E-ISSN 1557-9042, Vol. 30, no 5, p. 392-402Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The molecular processes involved in axonal regeneration after traumatic brain injury (TBI) are still not fully understood. In this study, we have established a novel in vitro injury model of TBI based on microcontact printing (μCP) that enables close-up investigations of injured neurons. The model is also suitable for quantitative measurements of axonal outgrowth, making it a useful tool in the studies of basic mechanisms behind axonal regeneration. Cortical neurons from mouse embryos are cultured on μCP cover-slips for 8 days, and the neurons are then injured in a precise manner using a thin plastic tip that does not affect the μCP pattern of extracellular matrix proteins. By close-up time-lapse experiments and immunostainings, we show that the neurons have a tremendous capacity to regenerate their neurites after injury. The cut induces growth cone formation, and the regenerating axons strictly follow the μCP pattern. Moreover, by using the injury model, we demonstrate that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) decreases axonal regeneration after injury without affecting the neurons' ability to form growth cones. Co-culture with glial cells does not rescue the axonal regeneration, indicating that the mechanism by which H2O2 affects axonal regeneration differ from its cytotoxic effect.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013. Vol. 30, no 5, p. 392-402
Keywords [en]
axonal injury, axonal regeneration, glia cell response to injury, models of injury, oxidative stress, hydrogen peroxide, animal cell, article, astrocyte, brain cortex, cytotoxicity, embryo, glia, in vitro study, molecular mechanics, mouse, nerve cell lesion, nerve fiber growth, nerve fiber regeneration, neurite, nonhuman, traumatic brain injury, Animals, Axons, Brain Injuries, Cells, Cultured, Coculture Techniques, Disease Models, Animal, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Nerve Regeneration, Neuroglia, Neurons
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-47482DOI: 10.1089/neu.2012.2562Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84874671504OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-47482DiVA, id: diva2:1465605
Available from: 2020-09-10 Created: 2020-09-10 Last updated: 2020-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus
By organisation
Acreo
In the same journal
Journal of Neurotrauma
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf