Experimental determination of the permeability of engineering textiles: Benchmark IIHexcel Reinforcements, France.
KU Leuven, Belgium.
University of Wisconsin, USA.
Hexcel Reinforcements, France.
Technische Universität Clausthal, Germany.
Universidade Do Porto, Portugal.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Technische Universität Clausthal, Germany.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Technische Universität Clausthal, Germany.
National University of Mar Del Plata, Argentina.
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Spain.
RISE, Swerea, SICOMP.
Technische Universität München, Germany.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
KU Leuven, Belgium.
University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
Technische Universität München, Germany.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
Pole de Plasturgie de l'Est, France.
University of Wisconsin, USA.
National University of Mar Del Plata, Argentina.
Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada.
Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pole de Plasturgie de l'Est, France.
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Switzerland.
Technische Universität München, Germany.
Technische Universität Clausthal, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing, ISSN 1359-835X, E-ISSN 1878-5840, Vol. 61, p. 172-184Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
In this second international permeability benchmark, the in-plane permeability values of a carbon fabric were studied by twelve research groups worldwide. One participant also investigated the deformation of the tested carbon fabric. The aim of this work was to obtain comparable results in order to make a step toward standardization of permeability measurements. Unidirectional injections were thus conducted to determine the unsaturated in-plane permeability tensor of the fabric. Procedures used by participants were specified in the guidelines defined for this benchmark. Participants were asked to use the same values for parameters such as fiber volume fraction, injection pressure and fluid viscosity to minimize sources of scatter. The comparison of the results from each participant was encouraging. The scatter between data obtained while respecting the guidelines was below 25%. However, a higher dispersion was observed when some parameters differed from the recommendations of this exercise.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier Ltd , 2014. Vol. 61, p. 172-184
Keywords [en]
A. Fabrics/textiles, D. Process monitoring, E. Resin flow, Permeability, Mechanical permeability, Process monitoring, Experimental determination, Fabrics/textiles, Fiber volume fractions, Fluid viscosity, In-plane permeability, Injection pressures, Permeability measurements, Resin flows, Carbon
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-45436DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.02.010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84896474751OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-45436DiVA, id: diva2:1457706
Note
CODEN: CASMF; Correspondence Address: Ruiz, E.; Département de Génie Mécanique, École Polytechnique de Montréal, Succursale Centre-Ville, C.P. 6079, Montréal, QC H3C 3A7, Canada; email: edu.ruiz@polymtl.ca
2020-08-122020-08-122020-12-01Bibliographically approved