Blending gelatin and cellulose nanofibrils: Biocomposites with tunable degradability and mechanical behaviorShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Nanomaterials, E-ISSN 2079-4991, Vol. 10, no 6, article id 1219Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Many studies show how biomaterial properties like stiffness, mechanical stimulation and surface topography can influence cellular functions and direct stem cell differentiation. In this work, two different natural materials, gelatin (Gel) and cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs), were combined to design suitable 3D porous biocomposites for soft-tissue engineering. Gel was selected for its well-assessed high biomimicry that it shares with collagen, from which it derives, while the CNFs were chosen as structural reinforcement because of their exceptional mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Three different compositions of Gel and CNFs, i.e., with weight ratios of 75:25, 50:50 and 25:75, were studied. The biocomposites were morphologically characterized and their total-and macro-porosity assessed, proving their suitability for cell colonization. In general, the pores were larger and more isotropic in the biocomposites compared to the pure materials. The influence of freeze-casting and dehydrothermal treatment (DHT) on mechanical properties, the absorption ability and the shape retention were evaluated. Higher content of CNFs gave higher swelling, and this was attributed to the pore structure. Cross-linking between CNFs and Gel using DHT was confirmed. The Young’s modulus increased significantly by adding the CNFs to Gel with a linear relationship with respect to the CNF amounts. Finally, the biocomposites were characterized in vitro by testing cell colonization and growth through a quantitative cell viability analysis performed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Additionally, the cell viability analysis was performed by the means of a Live/Dead test with Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs). All the biocomposites had higher cytocompatibility compared to the pure materials, Gel and CNFs. © 2020 by the authors.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG , 2020. Vol. 10, no 6, article id 1219
Keywords [en]
Cell-tissue interaction, Gelatin, Nanocellulose, Polymer blends, Soft-tissue
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-45186DOI: 10.3390/nano10061219Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85086915457OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-45186DiVA, id: diva2:1454260
Note
Funding details: Norges ForskningsrÃ¥d, 228147, 228147, 228147, 228147; Funding text 1: Funding: This research was funded by Research Council of Norway, Grant number 228147.; Funding text 2: Acknowledgments: The authors would like to thank the NORCEL project “Norwegian Nanocellulose Technology Platform” funded by the Research Council of Norway (Grant no. 228147), for providing financial support to this project.
2020-07-152020-07-152023-05-25Bibliographically approved