Assessing the robustness of powder rheology and permeability measurementsShow others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Additive Manufacturing, ISSN 2214-8604, E-ISSN 2214-7810, Vol. 35, article id 101203Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Powder metallurgy processes rely on powder flowability. However, flowability is not an intrinsic property and depends on the measurement conditions. Standards have been developed to adjust measurement methods to various flow conditions but there is presently questions whether current methods are adapted to the specific requirements of powder bed additive manufacturing. Rheology has been used to assess powder flowability but there is still limited information available on the robustness of the method. This paper presents the flow characteristics measured in five laboratories with a powder rheometer. Attempts were made to understand the sources of intra and inter laboratory variations and find ways to reduce them. The variations do not seem to be associated with sampling or environmental conditions. Experimental setup, calibration and/or the modification of the powder during handling could be associated with the variations observed. However, additional tests would be required to confirm the sources and improve the repeatability of the measurements.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2020. Vol. 35, article id 101203
Keywords [en]
Powder flowability, Repeatability, Reproducibility, Rheology, Round robin, Compressive strength, Powder metallurgy, Environmental conditions, Flow charac-teristics, Intrinsic property, Limited information, Measurement conditions, Measurement methods, Permeability measurements, Powder metallurgy process, Elasticity
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-45068DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101203Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85085274960OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-45068DiVA, id: diva2:1450334
Note
Funding details: University of Waterloo, UW; Funding text 1: The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Shirley Mercier and Roger Pelletier for setting up the tests and the characterisation at the National Research Council Canada (NRC) and their support in the preparation of the test protocol. The authors would also like to thank Vladimir Brailovski from the École de technologie Supérieure (ETS), Ehsan Toyserkani from the University of Waterloo for their support of this work and Ed Garboczi and Shawn Moylan from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) for suggestions in the manuscript.
2020-07-012020-07-012021-06-11Bibliographically approved