Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparability of RF-based indoor localisation solutions in heterogeneous environments: An experimental study
Ghent University, Belgium.
Ghent University, Belgium.
Ghent University, Belgium.
Technische Universität Berlin, Germany.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, ISSN 1743-8225, E-ISSN 1743-8233, Vol. 23, no 1-2, p. 92-114Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The growing popularity of indoor localisation research has resulted in a significant amount of research papers describing and evaluating innovative localisation solutions. Unfortunately, the results from most of these research papers cannot easily be compared since they are evaluated in different environments, use different evaluation criteria and typically tailor their solutions towards a single testbed environment. To evaluate how these different conditions influence the localisation performance, in this paper an exhaustive set of experiments has been performed, in which three different localisation solutions have been evaluated using multiple metrics in three different test environments: two types of office environments and an industry-like factory environment. None of the used localisation solutions was previously optimised for any of these test environments and they were all evaluated under similar conditions. The results reveal several weaknesses in the evaluation methods used in the majority of existing scientific literature of indoor localisation solutions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. , 2016. Vol. 23, no 1-2, p. 92-114
Keywords [en]
Benchmarking methodology, Experimental comparison, Fingerprinting, IEEE 802.11, IEEE 802.15.4, Indoor localisation, Performance metrics, RSSI-based localisation, Time of arrival, Benchmarking, Standards, IEEE 802.11s, Localisation, Indoor positioning systems
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-41871DOI: 10.1504/IJAHUC.2016.078483Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84983591786OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-41871DiVA, id: diva2:1377762
Note

Funding details: German Academic Exchange Service London; Funding details: 317989; Funding details: Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; Funding text 1: The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union's Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 317989 (STREP EVARILOS). The author Filip Lemic was partially supported by DAAD (German Academic Exchange Service).

Available from: 2019-12-12 Created: 2019-12-12 Last updated: 2019-12-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Voigt, Thiemo

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Voigt, Thiemo
By organisation
SICS
In the same journal
International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 3 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.35.9