Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of four environmental assessment tools in Swedish manufacturing: A case study
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, IVF.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, IVF.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9068-3527
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, IVF, Energi och miljö.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1826-8665
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Materials and Production, IVF.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3124-1723
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 11, no 7, article id 2173Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

To achieve sustainable development goals, it is essential to include the industrial system. There are sufficient numbers of tools and methods for measuring, assessing and improving the quality, productivity and efficiency of production, but the number of tools and methods for environmental initiatives on the shop floor is rather low. Incorporating environmental considerations into production and performance management systems still generally involves a top-down approach aggregated for an entire manufacturing plant. Green lean studies have been attempting to fill this gap to some extent, but the lack of detailed methodologies and practical tools for environmental manufacturing improvement on the shop floor is still evident. This paper reports on the application of four environmental assessment tools commonly used among Swedish manufacturing companies-Green Performance Map (GPM), Environmental Value Stream Mapping (EVSM), Waste Flow Mapping (WFM), and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)-to help practitioners and scholars to understand the different features of each tool, so in turn the right tool(s) can be selected according to particular questions and the industrial settings. Because there are some overlap and differences between the tools and a given tool may be more appropriate to a situation depending on the question posed, a combination of tools is suggested to embrace different types of data collection and analysis to include different environmental impacts for better prioritization and decision-making.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG , 2019. Vol. 11, no 7, article id 2173
Keywords [en]
Environmental assessment tool, Green lean, Sustainable manufacturing
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-39675DOI: 10.3390/su10022173Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85069754919OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-39675DiVA, id: diva2:1341029
Available from: 2019-08-07 Created: 2019-08-07 Last updated: 2019-08-07Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Kurdve, MartinZackrisson, MatsJönsson, ChristinaKristinsdottir, Anna Runa

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kurdve, MartinZackrisson, MatsJönsson, ChristinaKristinsdottir, Anna Runa
By organisation
IVFEnergi och miljö
In the same journal
Sustainability
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 45 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.35.7