Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence of oxidizer injection angle on the entrained flow gasification of torrefied wood powder
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), Bioeconomy, ETC Energy Technology Center. Luleå University of Technology, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6473-7090
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), Bioeconomy, ETC Energy Technology Center.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), Bioeconomy, ETC Energy Technology Center.ORCID iD: 0009-0004-9996-8659
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden (2017-2019), Bioeconomy, ETC Energy Technology Center.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2253-6845
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: Fuel processing technology, ISSN 0378-3820, E-ISSN 1873-7188, Vol. 181, p. 8-17Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the present work, 5 different axisymmetric burners with different directions of the oxidizer inlets were experimentally tested during oxygen blown gasification of torrefied wood powder. The burners were evaluated under two different O2/fuel ratios at a thermal power of 135 kWth, based on the heating value of torrefied wood powder. The evaluation was based on both conventional methods such as gas chromatography measurements and thermocouples and in-situ measurements using Tunable Diode Laser Absorption Spectroscopy. It was shown that changes in the near burner region influence the process efficiency significantly. Changing the injection angle of the oxidizer stream to form a converging oxidizer jet increased process efficiency by 20%. Besides increased process efficiency, it was shown that improvements in burner design also influence carbon conversion and hydrocarbon production. The burner with the best performance also produced less CH4 and achieved the highest carbon conversion. The effect of generating swirl via rotating the oxidizer jet axes was also investigated. Swirl broadened or removed the impingement area between the fuel and oxidizer jets, however resulting in differences in performance within the measurement uncertainty.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 181, p. 8-17
Keywords [en]
Biomass, Burner design, Entrained flow gasification, Process optimization, Syngas, TDLAS, Absorption spectroscopy, Carbon, Efficiency, Gas chromatography, Gasification, Optimization, Thermocouples, Conventional methods, Hydrocarbon production, Measurement uncertainty, Syn-gas, Tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy, Uncertainty analysis
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-35577DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2018.09.005Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85053436599OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-35577DiVA, id: diva2:1261231
Note

Funding details: Energimyndigheten; Funding text: This work was performed within the platform for entrained-flow gasification (Bio4Gasification) at the Swedish Gasification Centre financed by the Swedish Energy Agency and the member companies.

Available from: 2018-11-06 Created: 2018-11-06 Last updated: 2024-05-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Ögren, YngveWennebro, JonasSepman, AlexeyWiinikka, Henrik

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ögren, YngveWennebro, JonasSepman, AlexeyWiinikka, Henrik
By organisation
ETC Energy Technology Center
In the same journal
Fuel processing technology
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 52 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf