Planned maintenance
A system upgrade is planned for 10/12-2024, at 12:00-13:00. During this time DiVA will be unavailable.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A model to select the right infrastructure abstraction for Service Function Chaining
UGent - iMinds, Belgium.
UGent - iMinds, Belgium.
UGent - iMinds, Belgium.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks, NFV-SDN 2016, 2017, p. 233-239Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Through network function virtualization (NFV), telecom providers aim to flexibly re-use generic-purpose hardware to provide services on-demand and in an agile way. Service function chaining is becoming the preferred model to describe the characteristics of the packet-processing network functions which, together, form these services. NFV allows for network function embedding freedom, creating new dynamics between providers and the users requesting services. Users want this freedom to optimise the performance of their requested services, while providers aim to optimise their resource cost with it. This trade-off is heavily influenced by how the available infrastructure is exposed to the users. In this paper, we present an infrastructure abstraction model for network, compute and storage resources that exposes the infrastructure in an abstracted manner. We use this abstraction to propose a solution for the placement freedom trade-off problem by studying its relation with metrics that capture both the user's and the provider's aspects. We conclude with a heuristic that determines the right abstraction for particular scenarios.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. p. 233-239
Keywords [en]
Abstracting, Economic and social effects, Optimization, Software defined networking, Transfer functions, Virtual reality, Virtualization, Abstraction model, Network functions, Packet processing, Service functions, Services on demand, Storage resources, Telecom providers, Trade-off problem, Network function virtualization
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-30931DOI: 10.1109/NFV-SDN.2016.7919503Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85020031674ISBN: 9781509009336 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-30931DiVA, id: diva2:1139210
Conference
2016 IEEE Conference on Network Function Virtualization and Software Defined Networks, NFV-SDN 2016, 7 November 2016 through 10 November 2016
Available from: 2017-09-07 Created: 2017-09-07 Last updated: 2019-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sköldström, Pontus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sköldström, Pontus
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf