Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost of Waste Management: Plastic Cable Waste
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Swerea, Swerea IVF, Energi och miljö.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1826-8665
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Swerea, Swerea IVF, Energi och miljö.
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden, Swerea, Swerea IVF.
2014 (English)In: Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science, ISSN 2160-0392, E-ISSN 2160-0406, Vol. 4, no 2, article id 45002Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The main driver for recycling cable wastes is the high value of the conducting metal, while the plastic with its lower value is often neglected. New improved cable plastic recycling routes can provide both economic and environmental incentive to cable producers for moving up the “cable plastic waste ladder”. Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment, LCA, of the waste management of the cable scrap is suggested and explained as a method to analyze the pros and cons of different cable scrap recycling options at hand. Economic and environmental data about different recycling processes and other relevant processes and materials are given. Cable producers can use this data and method to assess the way they deal with the cable plastic waste today and compare it with available alternatives and thus illuminate the improvement potential of recycling cable plastic waste both in an environmental and in an economic sense. The methodology applied consists of: cradle-to-gate LCA for waste material to a recycled material (recyclate); quantifying the climate impact for each step on the waste ladder for the specific waste material; the use of economic and climate impact data in parallel; climate impact presented as a span to portray the insecurities related to which material the waste will replace; and possibilities for do-it-yourself calculations. Potentially, the methodology can be useful also for other waste materials in the future.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 4, no 2, article id 45002
Keywords [en]
Cable Recycling, Life Cycle Assessment, LCA, Life Cycle Cost, LCC, Economic Analysis, Climate Impact, Waste Recycling
National Category
Other Engineering and Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-30318DOI: 10.4236/aces.2014.42025OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-30318DiVA, id: diva2:1131662
Available from: 2017-08-15 Created: 2017-08-15 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Zackrisson, Mats
By organisation
Energi och miljöSwerea IVF
In the same journal
Advances in Chemical Engineering and Science
Other Engineering and Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 12 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.35.2