Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Probing material properties of polymeric surface layers with tapping mode AFM: which cantilever spring constant, tapping amplitude and amplitude set point gives good image contrast and minimal surface damage?
YKI – Ytkemiska institutet.
2010 (English)In: Ultramicroscopy, ISSN 0304-3991, E-ISSN 1879-2723, Vol. 110, no 4, 313-319 p.Article in journal (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

A phase shift between the oscillatory motion and drive motion of an AFM-cantilever used for tapping mode AFM imaging can be related to adhesive and elastic properties of surface layers. In this study it was studied how optimal contrast between hard and soft surface layers can be achieved while minimizing the surface damage. This was investigated by performing classical force-distance measurements while driving the cantilever as in tapping mode imaging. The amplitude and phase response as a function of the average tip-surface separation was recorded. Five different cantilevers with a wide range of spring constants and four different tapping amplitudes were investigated and compared. Based on these experiments it is concluded that too stiff cantilever, high free tapping amplitude and low amplitude set point value often lead to surface damage, while too low spring constant and low free tapping amplitude result in poor phase image contrast. Intermediate values where little surface damage and significant image contrast are obtained were identified. In all cases it was observed that the best image contrast was obtained when the amplitude set point was chosen such that the amplitude during imaging was reduced to approximately 50% of the free amplitude.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. Vol. 110, no 4, 313-319 p.
Keyword [en]
Probing material properties of polymeric surface layers with tapping mode AFM: which cantilever spring constant, tapping amplitude and amplitude set point gives good image contrast and minimal surface damage, AFM, Tapping mode, Phase, Energy dissipation, Spring constant, Amplitude, Set point
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-27540DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.01.002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-27540DiVA: diva2:1054545
Note
A2037Available from: 2016-12-08 Created: 2016-12-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
YKI – Ytkemiska institutet
In the same journal
Ultramicroscopy
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Altmetric score

Total: 4 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.26.0