Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Initial evaluation of measurement properties of the Work Environment Impact Questionnaire (WEIQ) - using Rasch analysis
Linköping University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9365-7033
Linköping University, Sweden; Uppsala University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1073-1977
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Safety and Transport, Measurement Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3700-3921
2024 (English)In: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, E-ISSN 1477-7525, Vol. 22, no 1, article id 43Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: To provide both preventive and rehabilitative conditions in a workplace, one must understand how employees experience work demands. Such an understanding can be obtained from each individual with valid and quality-assured questionnaires. The Work Environment Impact Questionnaire (WEIQ) is a new questionnaire for measuring employees’ self-perceived work ability in relation to their specific workplace environment. The purpose of this study was to assess the measurement properties in terms of construct validity of the WEIQ. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was conducted with 288 respondents from three different workplaces involving assisted living personnel, vocational rehabilitation personnel and personnel at a research institute. The measurement properties of the WEIQ were assessed according to Rasch Measurement Theory (RMT), including assessment of item-to-sample targeting, threshold ordering, item fit statistics, unidimensionality and reliability. Results: Item fit, i.e., fit residuals, item characteristic curves (ICC) and chi square values, were all satisfactory, and no disordered thresholds were present after collapsing the lowest response categories. However, issues with local dependent (LD) item correlations was present in 7.6% cases, four items showed statistically significant differential item functioning (DIF), where 11% of the respondents had person fit residuals outside the recommended range of ± 2.5 and the t-test for unidimensionality did not meet the criterion of 5%. Scale-to-sample targeting and reliability (0.92) were good. LD could be resolved with testlets and at the same time maintaining fit and improving dimensionality, but then the reliability decreased to 0.82. Conclusions: This study provides an initial validation of the WEIQ to be used for assessing employees’ self-perceived work ability. Most measurement properties were acceptable, but further exploration of LD, DIF and unidimensionality in additional work settings and with larger sample sizes is warranted. Trial registration: Not applicable.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central Ltd , 2024. Vol. 22, no 1, article id 43
Keywords [en]
Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Psychometrics; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Working Conditions; Workplace; adult; article; assisted living facility; construct validity; controlled study; cross-sectional study; diagnosis; female; human; male; Model of Human Occupation; questionnaire; Rasch analysis; reliability; vocational rehabilitation; work capacity; work environment; workplace; middle aged; psychology; psychometry; questionnaire; reproducibility; work environment; workplace
National Category
Occupational Health and Environmental Health
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-73591DOI: 10.1186/s12955-024-02260-zScopus ID: 2-s2.0-85195010761OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-73591DiVA, id: diva2:1872836
Note

Part of this work has been funded by the Swedish innovation agency, VINNOVA Dnr 2018–02512 project RISE Social and Health Impact Centre

Available from: 2024-06-18 Created: 2024-06-18 Last updated: 2024-07-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2129 kB)34 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2129 kBChecksum SHA-512
c52f829da98efb934c6cd9c094f141326a4ed83a070a98a5c3b8a9fb53585e07e38aec3da5e105c729e800e02bc4eaf02045455951d7ea2c1ea56b330b06d477
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Melin, Jeanette

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ekbladh, ElinYngve, MoaMelin, Jeanette
By organisation
Measurement Technology
In the same journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Occupational Health and Environmental Health

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 34 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 264 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf