Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An added aroma changes the behaviour of domestic pigs in a novel situation aimed for stunning
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Bioeconomy and Health, Agriculture and Food.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3748-3918
SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden.
2024 (English)In: Applied Animal Behaviour Science, ISSN 0168-1591, E-ISSN 1872-9045, Vol. 270, article id 106145Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The currently most widespread stunning method for pigs is high concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2), but this method is under scrutiny due to animal welfare deficits. One alternative method currently under development with potential to replace CO2 is nitrogen (N2) filled high expansion foam. While N2 does not elicit the same aversive behaviour as CO2, it is currently not known if the high expansion foam itself may be frightening to the pigs. Means to alleviate fear reactions to foam could consist of diverting pigs’ attention using aromas (an odour in combination with taste) of interest to them. The current study aimed to investigate if an added aroma (vanilla aroma) affected pigs’ avoidance and exploratory behaviour when exposed to air-filled high expansion foam in a foam box. The study included 50 pigs (30 females, 20 males) of 14–16 weeks of age, of different crosses between Yorkshire, Hampshire and Duroc. The pigs were randomly assigned to either the treatment with air-filled foam with added aroma or the control treatment with no added aroma, which they were exposed to in a foam box. The results showed that pigs with the aromatised foam expressed significantly more exploration behaviour directed towards the foam and box walls, but not towards the floor or the lid. The aromatised foam also resulted in a higher activity level of the pigs. In contrast to the hypotheses, pigs with aromatised foam expressed more avoidance behaviour, and escape attempts were exclusively observed when pigs were exposed to aromatised foam. Slipping events and frequency of vocalisations did not differ between pigs with and without aroma added to the foam. This study shows that an added aroma (taste and odour in combination) increased pigs’ exploration behaviour towards the foam, and thus could serve as a distraction for the pigs when inside a confined foam box. The results emphasise the importance of taking foam aroma into consideration in the further development of the N2-filled high expansion as a stunning method. The potential anxiety- or stress-reducing effect of any added aroma needs further investigation, and future studies should focus on assessing various types of aromas, and/or odours, as well as different concentrations of the compounds to determine which solution is most efficient in alleviating pig stress and anxiety. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier B.V. , 2024. Vol. 270, article id 106145
Keywords [en]
Olfaction, Pig production, Pig welfare, Porcine, Sensory stimulation, Smell, animal welfare, biostimulation, carbon dioxide, concentration (composition), pig, sensory system
National Category
Food Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-71973DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2023.106145Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85181020040OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-71973DiVA, id: diva2:1840658
Note

The authors thank the staff at the Swedish Pig Research Centre, SLU Lövsta, Sweden, for participation and support during the experiments, and Amanda Laufors, Sweden, for her great assistance during the practical parts of the experiments.

Available from: 2024-02-26 Created: 2024-02-26 Last updated: 2024-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1390 kB)71 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1390 kBChecksum SHA-512
1dfe5424fd623468ae60f7331768d029ecbb26afa46a589f90ec78fff6645a59f86a84123f4928d8b3681b0eaaf0fc971964cc487ce6077413204e27285a57fc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Lindahl, Cecilia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lindahl, Cecilia
By organisation
Agriculture and Food
In the same journal
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Food Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 71 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 357 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf