Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A verification of the ITTC/ISO speed/power trials analysis
University of Tokyo, Japan.
University of Tokyo, Japan.
University of Tokyo, Japan.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6266-2320
University of Tokyo, Japan.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Journal of Marine Science and Technology, ISSN 0948-4280, E-ISSN 1437-8213, Vol. 20, no 1, p. 2-13Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Speed and power (S/P) trials are most important to guarantee the ship’s propulsive performance. However, it was pointed out that the existing procedures often give a good guideline, but are not specific and can introduce inconsistent results. Recently, ITTC and ISO have improved their S/P trials procedures and harmonized the two procedures. During the harmonization process, we have verified the ‘Mean of Means’ (MoM) method and the ‘Iterative’ method which are used as the current correction methods and the ‘Direct Power Method’ and the ‘Extended Power Method’ which are applied for the evaluation of the acquired data. The results of verification are presented in this paper. The results show that using the ‘MoM’ method for each power setting, two double runs should be made to keep the accuracy of S/P trials, and the ‘Iterative’ method leads to less errors in average of the tested cases when 1 + 2 + 2 double runs are used in the ‘MoM’ method, although the methods are equally adequate if the time periods between the runs are short enough. In specific cases, e.g. in case of large speed range and/or humps and hollows within the speed–power curve, the ‘MoM’ method has advantages over the ‘Iterative’ method. In case of current time history deviating from the assumed parabolic/sinusoidal trend and the change of the current within the time span of two double runs is very high, neither of the methods are applicable. Summarizing the results, the ‘Iterative’ method is fully compatible with the simple ‘Direct Power Method’

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Japan , 2015. Vol. 20, no 1, p. 2-13
Keywords [en]
Speed, Correction method; Fully compatible; Guideline; Power curves; Power method; Power settings; Propulsive performance; Time-periods, Iterative methods
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-71792DOI: 10.1007/s00773-015-0304-7Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925519709OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-71792DiVA, id: diva2:1837931
Available from: 2024-02-15 Created: 2024-02-15 Last updated: 2024-02-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Werner, Sofia

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Werner, Sofia
In the same journal
Journal of Marine Science and Technology
Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf